On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 02:18, Walter Bright wrote:
> Anders Bergh wrote:
>>
>> You could probably make dmd run on some GNU/Darwin, but it's sort of
>> dead. There's http://www.puredarwin.org/ but I'm not sure if it
>> actually works yet. The iPhone is an ARM platform so dmd would
>> certainly not
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Anders Bergh wrote:
You could probably make dmd run on some GNU/Darwin, but it's sort of
dead. There's http://www.puredarwin.org/ but I'm not sure if it
actually works yet. The iPhone is an ARM platform so dmd would
certainly not work there...
If d
Walter Bright wrote:
Anders Bergh wrote:
You could probably make dmd run on some GNU/Darwin, but it's sort of
dead. There's http://www.puredarwin.org/ but I'm not sure if it
actually works yet. The iPhone is an ARM platform so dmd would
certainly not work there...
If dmd/phobos binaries for os
Hello Walter,
If dmd/phobos binaries for osx won't work on those machines, then it's
appropriate to have a different version identifier.
I'd assert the test should be if the systems are source code compatible.
Anders Bergh wrote:
You could probably make dmd run on some GNU/Darwin, but it's sort of
dead. There's http://www.puredarwin.org/ but I'm not sure if it
actually works yet. The iPhone is an ARM platform so dmd would
certainly not work there...
If dmd/phobos binaries for osx won't work on those
Walter Bright wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
They call it "Mac OS", then they add a version like this: "Mac OS 9".
Then when the tenth versions came it happened to be built on a nix
base/core (known as darwin) and they also added the X (probably to
reflect the new nix base, "X" is also ten using
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 19:32, Walter Bright wrote:
> Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>
>> About the "darwin" vs "OSX". There are other operating systems than Mac OS
>> X that could use "darwin" as the version identifier if someone made a D
>> compiler available. iPhone OS (this is just Mac OS X on the iph
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
About the "darwin" vs "OSX". There are other operating systems than Mac
OS X that could use "darwin" as the version identifier if someone made a
D compiler available. iPhone OS (this is just Mac OS X on the iphone and
ipod thouch but it's called iPhone OS) and GNU/Darwin f
Anders F Björklund Wrote:
> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>
> > FreeBSD breaks existing code, and so will OSX whenever darwin is removed.
> > Now a developer already active on those platform is forced to somehow make
> > sure both identifiers are in place until some unknown point in the future.
> >
Tomas Lindquist Olsen, el 16 de abril a las 10:46 me escribiste:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Jordan Miner
> wrote:
> > Walter Bright Wrote:
> >
> >> Because gcc on linux predefines "linux", not "Linux".
> >
> > Please change the version identifier from linux to Linux.
> >
>
> I realise I p
Walter Bright wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
They call it "Mac OS", then they add a version like this: "Mac OS 9".
Then when the tenth versions came it happened to be built on a nix
base/core (known as darwin) and they also added the X (probably to
reflect the new nix base, "X" is also ten using
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Jordan Miner
wrote:
> Walter Bright Wrote:
>
>> Because gcc on linux predefines "linux", not "Linux".
>
> Please change the version identifier from linux to Linux.
>
I realise I probably did my part to spike this discussion.
However, given the complaints Walter g
12 matches
Mail list logo