Re: TDPL available for preorder on amazon.com

2009-06-11 Thread Jarrett Billingsley
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Saaaem...@needmail.com wrote: Hope you like the cover - my sister's art. http://tinyurl.com/lyrsyk Andrei The first programming book I'll buy :) 500 pages.. is that normal for programming books? What he's not telling you is that the pages are only 10cm

Re: TDPL available for preorder on amazon.com

2009-06-11 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
Saaa wrote: Hope you like the cover - my sister's art. http://tinyurl.com/lyrsyk Andrei The first programming book I'll buy :) 500 pages.. is that normal for programming books? That's just an estimate. Any relation to a stable D2? Well, one begets the other. Andrei

Serialization for D. Comments, please!

2009-06-11 Thread BCS
the latest and greatest: http://arrayboundserror.blogspot.com/2009/06/serialization-for-d-part-6-of-n.html This time I'm hoping for some feedback on how people want to interface with 3rd party types.

Re: TDPL available for preorder on amazon.com

2009-06-11 Thread Nick Sabalausky
Saaa em...@needmail.com wrote in message news:h0q2tb$1nq...@digitalmars.com... 500 pages.. is that normal for programming books? Roughly, yea. Most of the ones on my bookshelf range from 300 to 1000 pages.

Re: Serialization for D. Comments, please!

2009-06-11 Thread grauzone
BCS wrote: the latest and greatest: http://arrayboundserror.blogspot.com/2009/06/serialization-for-d-part-6-of-n.html This time I'm hoping for some feedback on how people want to interface with 3rd party types. Is there any real reason for all those mixins?

Re: Serialization for D. Comments, please!

2009-06-11 Thread grauzone
Is there any real reason for all those mixins? which ones? All used by the user. That would be Serializable and SerializableRecuring.

Re: Serialization for D. Comments, please!

2009-06-11 Thread grauzone
BCS wrote: Reply to grauzone, Is there any real reason for all those mixins? which ones? All used by the user. That would be Serializable and SerializableRecuring. What else would you use? I guess if I really wanted to I could use the same device as for 3rd party types, but that just

Re: Serialization for D. Comments, please!

2009-06-11 Thread BCS
Reply to grauzone, BCS wrote: Reply to grauzone, Is there any real reason for all those mixins? which ones? All used by the user. That would be Serializable and SerializableRecuring. What else would you use? I guess if I really wanted to I could use the same device as for 3rd party

Re: cv2pdb 0.3 released

2009-06-11 Thread torhu
On 09.06.2009 20:44, Rainer Schuetze wrote: The visualizer macros in autoexp.dat are quite complex and can be slow, especially if you have associative arrays with a lot of entries. Please try it without the autoexp.dat entries. Didn't seem to matter much, but then there were no assoc arrays

Re: cv2pdb 0.3 released

2009-06-11 Thread torhu
On 09.06.2009 21:25, Bill Baxter wrote: On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:43 PM, torhun...@spam.invalid wrote: As someone mostly used to msvc 6, I have to say that debugging in msvc 9 is incredibly sluggish in comparison. Most actions in the debugger takes several seconds to complete, while in msvc

Re: Serialization for D. Comments, please!

2009-06-11 Thread Christopher Wright
grauzone wrote: Is there any real reason for all those mixins? which ones? All used by the user. That would be Serializable and SerializableRecuring. Also, what is curing in this context, and why would you need to do it multiple times?

Re: Serialization for D. Comments, please!

2009-06-11 Thread BCS
Hello Christopher, SerializableRecuring. Also, what is curing in this context, and why would you need to do it multiple times? My spelling sucks: s/Recuring/Recurring/