Moritz Warning wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:35:12 +, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:31:49 +0100, Don wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:22:58 +0100, grauzone wrote:
bearophile wrote:
grauzone:
But I have a problem: the compiler is either extremely slow
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:35:12 +, Moritz Warning wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:31:49 +0100, Don wrote:
>
>> Moritz Warning wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:22:58 +0100, grauzone wrote:
>>>
bearophile wrote:
> grauzone:
>> But I have a problem: the compiler is either extremely s
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:31:49 +0100, Don wrote:
> Moritz Warning wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:22:58 +0100, grauzone wrote:
>>
>>> bearophile wrote:
grauzone:
> But I have a problem: the compiler is either extremely slow for me,
> or is stuck in an endless loop. All it does is to s
Moritz Warning wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:22:58 +0100, grauzone wrote:
bearophile wrote:
grauzone:
But I have a problem: the compiler is either extremely slow for me, or
is stuck in an endless loop. All it does is to slowly allocate memory.
I aborted the compilation after ~ 20 minutes and
"Moritz Warning" wrote in message
news:hhlcd1$223...@digitalmars.com...
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:41:30 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> "hello there" wrote in message
>> news:hhl737$1pg...@digitalmars.com...
>>> (dsource.org is messed up, some library is alpha, beta, abandoned,
>>> incomplete
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:41:30 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "hello there" wrote in message
> news:hhl737$1pg...@digitalmars.com...
>> (dsource.org is messed up, some library is alpha, beta, abandoned,
>> incomplete, not compile etc).
>>
>>
> There's an update to dsource.org in the works that wi
"hello there" wrote in message
news:hhl737$1pg...@digitalmars.com...
> (dsource.org is messed up, some library is alpha, beta, abandoned,
> incomplete, not compile etc).
>
There's an update to dsource.org in the works that will make it a lot easier
to sort out the active stable stuff from eve
On 2009-12-31 13:48:09 -0500, Walter Bright said:
Happy New Year!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.054.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.038.zip
Many thanks to the numerous people who contribu
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:16:00 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Well I'm sorry to tell that inout is useless as currently implemented.
One important motivating use case was:
inout(char)[] blah(inout(char)[] input) {
return input;
}
void main()
{
blah("xyz");
blah("xyz".dup);
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:22:58 +0100, grauzone wrote:
> bearophile wrote:
>> grauzone:
>>> But I have a problem: the compiler is either extremely slow for me, or
>>> is stuck in an endless loop. All it does is to slowly allocate memory.
>>> I aborted the compilation after ~ 20 minutes and 2 GB RAM a
this is what i think about D.
I don't mean to insult people.
thanks.
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:20:08 -0500, Walter Bright
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
(I'm assuming bug 1961('scoped const') is considered to be fixed).
Sadly, it's not fixed yet :(
struct S
{
int x;
inout(int)* getX() inout { return &x;}
}
void main()
hi, i am c# programmer. i am still junior compare to all of you guys.
i've been monitoring d for 1 year. who knows I will use it too.
Extrawurst Wrote:
> "And D [..] is not going to become big enough [..] cause there is no big
> company backing it up"
> - well this is quite a controversal state
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:03:25 +0100, grauzone wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Happy New Year!
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.054.zip
>>
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.038.zip
>>
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> The only thing I could get to work is this:
>
>
> struct S
> {
> int x;
> }
>
> inout(int *) getSX(inout S* s) { return &s.x;}
>
> void main()
> {
> S s;
> const(S)* sp = &s;
> int *x = getSX(&s);
> //int *y = getSX(sp); // uncomment this
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:20:08 -0500, Walter Bright
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
(I'm assuming bug 1961('scoped const') is considered to be fixed).
Sadly, it's not fixed yet :(
struct S
{
int x;
inout(int)* getX() inout { return &x;}
}
void main()
{
S s;
int *x = s.g
16 matches
Mail list logo
