Re: dmd 1.056 and 2.040 release

2010-01-31 Thread Don
strtr wrote: Walter Bright Wrote: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.056.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.040.zip Thanks to the many people who contributed to this update! Do you ever find new

Re: dmd 1.056 and 2.040 release

2010-01-31 Thread Michel Fortin
On 2010-01-30 22:35:28 -0500, Walter Bright said: Michel Fortin wrote: It's great to have TLS working on Mac OS X. But it looks like it suffers from the same linking problem as the module info section. I've added some useful observations to bugzilla that might help fix the issue in case you

Re: dmd 1.056 and 2.040 release

2010-01-31 Thread Walter Bright
Michel Fortin wrote: This has nothing to do with a partially recompiled program. It's about something interesting I added to this bug report. And trust me, I compiled the test case from scratch before using dumpobj and objdump on the object files and the linked executables. All right, except

Re: dmd 1.056 and 2.040 release

2010-01-31 Thread Walter Bright
Michel Fortin wrote: It's great to have TLS working on Mac OS X. But it looks like it suffers from the same linking problem as the module info section. I've added some useful observations to bugzilla that might help fix the issue in case you want to revisit it: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/s

Re: dmd 1.056 and 2.040 release

2010-01-31 Thread Leandro Lucarella
Simen kjaeraas, el 30 de enero a las 23:23 me escribiste: > Walter Bright wrote: > > > > >http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html > >http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.056.zip > > > > > >http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html > >http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.040.zip > > > >Thank