On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:14:01 +0200, Matthias Pleh wrote:
> Ok,
> as already mentioned in the old thread I have set up a testpage to make
> the suggested (and some other minor) changes. So we should decide, which
> layout we should use for the wiki.
>
> a) the old one
> b) the current
> http:/
W dniu 06.06.2010 19:14, Matthias Pleh pisze:
Ok,
as already mentioned in the old thread I have set up a testpage to make
the suggested (and some other minor) changes.
So we should decide, which layout we should use for the wiki.
a) the old one
b) the current
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.c
Adam Ruppe wrote:
On 6/5/10, Stewart Gordon wrote:
Others claim that some layouts just can't be made fluid.
The most annoying thing is the web is fluid by default - you have to
fight it to make it fixed width! But, meh, people are stupid.
Taken the words out of my mouth there. I once cam
"Stewart Gordon" wrote in message
news:huj8co$od...@digitalmars.com...
>
> Taken the words out of my mouth there. I once came across this:
>
> http://www.wiltshirefarmfoods.com/accessibility.asp
> "Wiltshire Farm Foods has worked hard to make this site as accessible to
> as many customers as po
"Piotrek" wrote in message
news:huj4su$hv...@digitalmars.com...
>W dniu 06.06.2010 19:14, Matthias Pleh pisze:
>> Ok,
>> as already mentioned in the old thread I have set up a testpage to make
>> the suggested (and some other minor) changes.
>> So we should decide, which layout we should use for
