Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I think this site has good CSS tutorials: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/
Here is a tutorial for a liquid three column layout with a header and a
footer: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/floatutorial/tutorial0916.htm
Thanks!
On 05.10.2010 04:28, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:i8d77c$1bf...@digitalmars.com...
Stewart Gordon wrote:
The layout breaks in anything but the default text zoom.
The annoying thing about this is everyone says "don't use tables for
layout, use CSS." Except that
"Stephan Soller" wrote in message
news:i8epjv$1d3...@digitalmars.com...
> On 05.10.2010 04:28, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Walter Bright" wrote in message
>> news:i8d77c$1bf...@digitalmars.com...
>>> Stewart Gordon wrote:
The layout breaks in anything but the default text zoom.
>>>
>>> The a
"Stephan Soller" wrote in message
news:i8epjv$1d3...@digitalmars.com...
> (and the search engines are very happy about proper HTML code, too).
I've actually come across this point before, that search engines will rank a
page that doesn't use tables for layout better than one that does. I can't
On 05/10/2010 02:13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/4/10 18:54 CDT, Walter Bright wrote:
Brian Hay wrote:
With all due respect to Walter, as a professional web designer I have
to agree with Andrei. It's terrible for all the reasons mentioned ...
and more. "1995 programmer art" sums it up.
O
On 05.10.2010 12:24, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Stephan Soller" wrote in message
news:i8epjv$1d3...@digitalmars.com...
(and the search engines are very happy about proper HTML code, too).
I've actually come across this point before, that search engines will rank a
page that doesn't use tables
On 05.10.2010 12:13, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Stephan Soller" wrote in message
news:i8epjv$1d3...@digitalmars.com...
On 05.10.2010 04:28, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:i8d77c$1bf...@digitalmars.com...
Stewart Gordon wrote:
The layout breaks in anything but the
Stephan Soller wrote:
This is especially handy when doing a presentation about a
programming language since you can use JavaScript to write a small
syntax highlighter (the grammar in the D documentation was really handy
for that). :)
A javascript D syntax highlighter? Please post!
This is actually a better implementation of a fix in 0.21 Highlighting of
known versions is correct now. For one thing it would only highlight if the
version statement was at the beginning of the line.
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=379
On 05/10/2010 06:51, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I think this site has good CSS tutorials: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/
Here is a tutorial for a liquid three column layout with a header and a
footer: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/floatutorial/tutorial0916.htm
That's geared towards creating a layout wi
That's because HTML/CSS is a pretty terrible language for anything
beyond simple layouts. It shares more with Word/PDF/PostScript in terms
of its purpose and history than it does with real gui layout engines
(GTK, QT, etc).
Hardcore HTML/CSS people tout the virtues of separating the content fr
On 04/10/2010 19:42, Walter Bright wrote:
Stewart Gordon wrote:
The layout breaks in anything but the default text zoom.
The annoying thing about this is everyone says "don't use tables for
layout, use CSS." Except that using CSS for layout DOESN'T WORK
RELIABLY. With tables, I can get 3 colum
Stewart Gordon wrote:
Indeed, here are just a few things I hate to bits about CSS:
Sure, but we're kind of stuck with it. While we can invent a new programming
language, I don't think that inventing a new browser markup language is going to
get any traction without convincing Microsoft, Googl
"Arlo White" wrote in message
news:i8gem3$20a...@digitalmars.com...
> That's because HTML/CSS is a pretty terrible language for anything beyond
> simple layouts. It shares more with Word/PDF/PostScript in terms of its
> purpose and history than it does with real gui layout engines (GTK, QT,
>
"Stewart Gordon" wrote in message
news:i8gfqi$22l...@digitalmars.com...
> On 04/10/2010 19:42, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Stewart Gordon wrote:
>>> The layout breaks in anything but the default text zoom.
>>
>> The annoying thing about this is everyone says "don't use tables for
>> layout, use CSS."
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:i8gj1i$28h...@digitalmars.com...
> Stewart Gordon wrote:
>> Indeed, here are just a few things I hate to bits about CSS:
>
> Sure, but we're kind of stuck with it. While we can invent a new
> programming language, I don't think that inventing a new browser m
16 matches
Mail list logo
