On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:19:27 -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote: >> I would like to point out that the table in the documentation for >> std.container is still messed up. Walter, could this be because you >> are building the docs using win32.mak? When I build with posix.mak it >> looks fine. >> >> -Lars > > An unfortunate side effect of how ddoc deals with conditional > compilation is that any module which wants to produce the same > documentation with different versions needs to make sure that it has the > some ddoc comments for each version and possibly adding stubs for > functions which are platform-specific just so you can have ddoc comments > on them. std.container probably hasn't done that properly.
Not sure that's the problem, it seems to be only the table cells declared with $(TDNW ...) that are missing. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5103