Re: [Article Context, First Draft] Concurrency, Parallelism and D

2011-04-11 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 4/10/11 1:23 AM, Russel Winder wrote: On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 21:37 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: [ . . . ] I see. I go by "Bugs in Writing" (awesome book) and Strunk/White. They both recommend the comma, no ifs and buts (hard for me to get used to because in Romanian that comma is _never_

Re: [Article Context, First Draft] Concurrency, Parallelism and D

2011-04-11 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 04/11/2011 07:31 AM, Alix Pexton wrote: On 11/04/2011 12:56, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/11/2011 03:26 AM, Alix Pexton wrote: I have to agree with Don, burn the book, it is wholly responsible for the decline in creativity in English writing (imho). The book is for technical writing, a

Re: [Article Context, First Draft] Concurrency, Parallelism and D

2011-04-11 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 04/11/2011 03:09 AM, Don wrote: Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/10/2011 06:29 PM, Don wrote: Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote: On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote: On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu

Re: [Article Context, First Draft] Concurrency, Parallelism and D

2011-04-11 Thread Alix Pexton
On 11/04/2011 12:56, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/11/2011 03:26 AM, Alix Pexton wrote: I have to agree with Don, burn the book, it is wholly responsible for the decline in creativity in English writing (imho). The book is for technical writing, and I didn't find absorbing it has hurt in an

Re: [Article Context, First Draft] Concurrency, Parallelism and D

2011-04-11 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 04/11/2011 03:26 AM, Alix Pexton wrote: I have to agree with Don, burn the book, it is wholly responsible for the decline in creativity in English writing (imho). The book is for technical writing, and I didn't find absorbing it has hurt in any way whatever creativity I may have. Andrei

Re: [Article Context, First Draft] Concurrency, Parallelism and D

2011-04-11 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu
On 04/11/2011 03:09 AM, Don wrote: For sure, but it was not the only item. The recommendation is use 'that' vs 'which' was an even more offensive item. I found that rule to be very helpful to my writing. Andrei

Re: [Article Context, First Draft] Concurrency, Parallelism and D

2011-04-11 Thread Alix Pexton
On 11/04/2011 09:09, Don wrote: Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/10/2011 06:29 PM, Don wrote: Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote: On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote: On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wr

Re: [Article Context, First Draft] Concurrency, Parallelism and D

2011-04-11 Thread Don
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/10/2011 06:29 PM, Don wrote: Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/09/2011 09:27 PM, dsimcha wrote: On 4/9/2011 10:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 04/09/2011 08:31 PM, dsimcha wrote: On 4/9/2011 7:56 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I think the article's title