== Quote from Damian Ziemba (nazr...@driv.pl)'s article
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:27:40 +0300, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
+1 to Caligo. I agree that Tango is a good library (and was the best one
for D1) but, IMHO, porting it to D2 is a bad idea.
I'm the one who has a big D1+Tango project and
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:50:09 +, zsxxsz wrote:
I don't like Phobos design, which takes all libs in the same path
looking so urgly, but tango seperate libs in different path according to
its function using,
so I like tango's design.
You will never satisfy both worlds (simplicity vs
On 11/05/2011 10:56 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:50:09 +, zsxxsz wrote:
I don't like Phobos design, which takes all libs in the same path
looking so urgly, but tango seperate libs in different path according to
its function using,
so I like tango's design.
You will
