"Stewart Gordon" wrote in message
news:jcgkhi$2ohd$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 16/12/2011 18:26, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> For example, I have an articles section on my site that (currently) uses
>> TangoCMS. I neither know nor care what doctype TangoCMS is sending out
>> (and
>> I have even
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:xhaizhcmeybruijmp...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net...
> On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 22:25:27 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> *snip*
>
> I agree pretty much entirely, but meh, when web 2.0 gives
> you a turd, you make a shit sandwich and you LIKE it!
lol
On 12/15/2011 2:25 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/15/2011 4:16 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I wonder if we can list breaking changes in a separate sections in the
changelog.
Any bug fix is a breaking change - code can and does depend on bugs
(often inadvertently).
I've never seen code depend o
On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 22:48:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
That actually has exactly the same problem. You're slicing a
temporary. You can't slice a static array unless it's an actual
variable, or you're going to have problems. b points to a slice
of a static array which doesn't exist
On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 23:41:19 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
Yes:
I'll agree that some of the validator's things help
with that, but not all of it.
If you write block in inline,
the validator will reject it, but it works... and that's
a useful thing when doing drag+drop applications (sin
On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 22:25:27 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
*snip*
I agree pretty much entirely, but meh, when web 2.0 gives
you a turd, you make a shit sandwich and you LIKE it!
On 16/12/2011 15:09, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 13:33:06 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
But whatever I try to validate it as, there are errors.
Does validation make any positive difference at all?
Yes:
- it's a useful step in diagnosing problems with a webpage
- it helps
On 16/12/2011 18:26, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
For example, I have an articles section on my site that (currently) uses
TangoCMS. I neither know nor care what doctype TangoCMS is sending out (and
I have even less interest in mucking with it's internals to change it), and
yet when I want to bold or
On Friday, December 16, 2011 22:37:50 Christian Manning wrote:
> How about this as a better test case?
>
> ubyte[4] a;
> auto x() {
> return a;
> }
> void main() {
> auto b = x()[1..$];
> }
That actually has exactly the same problem. You're slicing a temporary. You
can't slice a static array un
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:dxjkyeeqrhsgsknfh...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net...
>
> So is cool, but is probably bad.
>
Yea, I totally agree.
>> C. You may be operating with a workflow where the web designer is
>> CSS-only, but that's not always the case, and I think reasonable
On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 21:19:27 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
A. While CSS is acceptable for styling (though I would change
some things), it's pure shit for layouts.
I wouldn't say that, completely. I do use a html template,
but only for the outer layouts; it's a frame of sorts that
I can
On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 16:43:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, December 16, 2011 16:26:11 Christian Manning wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 December 2011 at 07:05:25 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
> Highlights are use of XMM floating point registers in 64 bit
> targets, and now supporting O
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:anfqlbdugtkomnzbu...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net...
>
> The important thing though is to make sure the html describes
> the data well. Once you put in any kind of presentation in there,
> you break this approach.
>
> class="red" no no, what if it's a blu
On Saturday, 10 December 2011 at 23:05:11 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Highlights are use of XMM floating point registers in 64 bit
targets, and now supporting OS X 64 as a target.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.072.zip
The D2 version will follow
On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 18:28:07 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I've started going back to and . Why?
I find this generally sane, but I can't agree with D. (lol)
And seriously, who's going to be applying a custom stylesheet
to my pages?
My work D project recently brought on a new desig
"Adam D. Ruppe" < destructiona...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:virlzxfnfkylbbcce...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net...
> On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 13:33:06 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
>> But whatever I try to validate it as, there are errors.
>
> Does validation make any positive differen
On 12/16/2011 5:33 AM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
Or that you
found it on a lot of webpages and just copied it without any clue of what it
means?
You can blame me for that, not Andrei.
On Friday, December 16, 2011 16:26:11 Christian Manning wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 December 2011 at 07:05:25 UTC, Walter Bright
>
> wrote:
> > Highlights are use of XMM floating point registers in 64 bit
> > targets, and now supporting OS X 64 as a target.
> >
> > http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/
On Wednesday, 14 December 2011 at 07:05:25 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Highlights are use of XMM floating point registers in 64 bit
targets, and now supporting OS X 64 as a target.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.057.zip
A lot of people put a ton
On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 13:33:06 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
But whatever I try to validate it as, there are errors.
Does validation make any positive difference at all?
I used to do it, but it prohibits things that are useful
and work fine in practice* without offering much, if anything
On 14/12/2011 10:12, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/12/11 7:46 PM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 06/12/2011 05:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://d-p-l.org
Andrei
Why does it have an HTML 4.01 doctype but then go on to use XHTML syntax???
Stewart.
I wouldn't know. What needs to be done?
21 matches
Mail list logo
