On 03-01-2012 08:49, Caligo wrote:
Considering the rate at which bugs are being discovered and fixed, would
it be possible to shorten the release cycle, say, every 2-3 weeks
instead of 1-2 months?
Perhaps some kind of experimental releases would be better. It could
help getting new features
On 03/01/2012 14:49, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 03-01-2012 08:49, Caligo wrote:
Considering the rate at which bugs are being discovered and fixed, would
it be possible to shorten the release cycle, say, every 2-3 weeks
instead of 1-2 months?
Perhaps some kind of experimental releases would
On 03-01-2012 15:56, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 03/01/2012 14:49, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 03-01-2012 08:49, Caligo wrote:
Considering the rate at which bugs are being discovered and fixed, would
it be possible to shorten the release cycle, say, every 2-3 weeks
instead of 1-2 months?
On 03.01.2012 16:07, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 03-01-2012 15:56, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 03/01/2012 14:49, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 03-01-2012 08:49, Caligo wrote:
Considering the rate at which bugs are being discovered and fixed,
would
it be possible to shorten the release cycle,
On 1/3/2012 6:49 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Perhaps some kind of experimental releases would be better. It could help
getting new features out to the community (and thus tested) faster.
We call them betas g.
But anyone can pull the latest from github and use it, many do.
On 03-01-2012 19:47, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/3/2012 6:49 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Perhaps some kind of experimental releases would be better. It could help
getting new features out to the community (and thus tested) faster.
We call them betas g.
But anyone can pull the latest from
On 1/3/2012 10:55 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 03-01-2012 19:47, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/3/2012 6:49 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Perhaps some kind of experimental releases would be better. It could help
getting new features out to the community (and thus tested) faster.
We call
On 03-01-2012 20:25, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/3/2012 10:55 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 03-01-2012 19:47, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/3/2012 6:49 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Perhaps some kind of experimental releases would be better. It could
help
getting new features out to the
Alex Rønne Petersen xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:jdviuj$16e$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 03-01-2012 19:47, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/3/2012 6:49 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Perhaps some kind of experimental releases would be better. It could
help
getting new features out to
On 1/3/2012 1:25 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/3/2012 10:55 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 03-01-2012 19:47, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/3/2012 6:49 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Perhaps some kind of experimental releases would be better. It could
help
getting new features out to the
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Sean Cavanaugh
worksonmymach...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/3/2012 1:25 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/3/2012 10:55 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 03-01-2012 19:47, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/3/2012 6:49 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Perhaps some kind of
11 matches
Mail list logo
