On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 05:40 +0200, David Nadlinger wrote:
[…]
Not really – if I don't get a first beta of the next version out
in the next few days, it will unfortunately take *much* longer
(exams mid/end August, need to prepare).
[…]
Is there any way of making the LDC development activity a
On Monday, 10 June 2013 at 23:54:41 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 6/11/13, Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:19:20 -0400, Anthony Goins
neonto...@gmail.com
wrote:
Will there be video for Andrew Edwards?
IIRC, Andrew specifically requested not to be
Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1g47df/dconf_2013_metaprogramming_in_the_real_world_by/
Hackernews: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5861237
Twitter: https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/344431490257526785
Facebook:
On Monday, 10 June 2013 at 16:14:32 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Please discuss on official thread:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/adyanbsdsxsfdpvoo...@forum.dlang.org
This library is authored by Jacob Carlborg and has been around
through the D1/Tango days.
Review is being suspended while we work
hah, I have a PV solar module sitting in my house right now...
I'll be installing it (and the rest of my setup) as soon as I
have another two or the grand to spend.
It is great stuff, solar power is almost free money if you can
wait 20 years for it.
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 15:28:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
hah, I have a PV solar module sitting in my house right now...
I'll be installing it (and the rest of my setup) as soon as I
have another two or the grand to spend.
It is great stuff, solar power is almost free money if you can
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 16:19:20 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 15:28:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
hah, I have a PV solar module sitting in my house right now...
I'll be installing it (and the rest of my setup) as soon as I
have another two or the grand to spend.
It
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 16:19:20 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Combine that with good government subsidies and a deal to sell
the power back to the grid and it's more like 10 years, max
Aye, that's what I was hoping to get (New York State would have
given like 50% money back) but alas I
On 6/11/2013 8:28 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
It is great stuff, solar power is almost free money if you can wait 20 years for
it.
Yeah, but you'll have to replace it before 20 years!
Am 11.06.2013 14:33, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1g47df/dconf_2013_metaprogramming_in_the_real_world_by/
Hackernews: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5861237
Twitter: https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/344431490257526785
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 18:47:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Yeah, but you'll have to replace it before 20 years!
Here's the beauty of it though: the manufacturer offers a 25 year
warranty! I've heard stories of PV panels from the 70's still
working too. I betcha the lifetime depends on
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:21:31 -0400, John Colvin
john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 18:47:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/11/2013 8:28 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
It is great stuff, solar power is almost free money if you can wait 20
years for
it.
Yeah, but
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 19:38:13 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:21:31 -0400, John Colvin
john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 18:47:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/11/2013 8:28 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
It is great stuff, solar power
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:44:35 -0400, John Colvin
john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not ready to roll out as the energy of the future, but in certain
circumstances it's a good deal for an individual.
It's not a good deal for the taxpayers who have to subsidize it to make it
a
On 6/11/2013 12:21 PM, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 18:47:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/11/2013 8:28 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
It is great stuff, solar power is almost free money if you can wait 20 years for
it.
Yeah, but you'll have to replace it before 20 years!
On 6/11/13, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Circuit boards, inverters, etc., also fail, and you'd need some assurance
you
can get replacement parts for 20 years.
I bet most companies don't even get to live 20 years. And usually the
older a product, the harder (i.e. more
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 19:38:13 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I have to laugh at this. Solar is *almost* free money *if*
you can wait 20 years
A 20 year payback time is no big deal to me, the house won't pay
for itself compared to renting for a similar timeframe either,
but I see it
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 08:05:55 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 05:40 +0200, David Nadlinger wrote:
[…]
Not really – if I don't get a first beta of the next version
out in the next few days, it will unfortunately take *much*
longer (exams mid/end August, need to prepare).
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 03:40:16 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
but there is some funky business going on with CTFE in 2.063
pretty much holding up any further work.
Derp. Turns out that actually calling the newly added
Expression::init during startup might be a good idea.
Working on
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:18:09 -0400, Adam D. Ruppe
destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 19:38:13 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I have to laugh at this. Solar is *almost* free money *if* you can
wait 20 years
A 20 year payback time is no big deal to me, the house
On 6/11/2013 1:11 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 6/11/13, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Circuit boards, inverters, etc., also fail, and you'd need some assurance
you
can get replacement parts for 20 years.
I bet most companies don't even get to live 20 years. And usually the
Steven Schveighoffer:
I have no doubt that solar technology will continue to
innovate, but the worst thing we can do right now is subsidize
it. When it's ready (and it will be), it will succeed on its
own merits.
The situation is far more complex than that.
Bye,
bearophile
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 20:47:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Actually, parts for old cars are a lot cheaper than for new
ones! But I think that's an anomaly.
I guess it totally depends on where you live. :)
On 6/11/2013 1:18 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 19:38:13 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I have to laugh at this. Solar is *almost* free money *if* you can wait 20
years
A 20 year payback time is no big deal to me, the house won't pay for itself
compared to renting
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:51:53 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 6/11/2013 1:18 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 19:38:13 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I have to laugh at this. Solar is *almost* free money *if* you can
wait 20
years
A 20
On 6/11/2013 1:47 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 20:47:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Actually, parts for old cars are a lot cheaper than for new ones! But I think
that's an anomaly.
I guess it totally depends on where you live. :)
In the US.
For example, my daily
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 20:51:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Owning a home has lots of nice advantages, but saving money
isn't reliably one of them.
I agreed with you until last year, but the very low mortgage
interest rates and fitting in principle prepayments into my
budget tipped me
On 6/11/2013 2:19 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Define financially better off :)
You have mo' moolah. Is their any other definition?
And this is not even a fair conversation, because there are so many variables to
consider.
I'd like to pop that default conception that buying is
On 6/11/2013 2:20 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 20:51:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Owning a home has lots of nice advantages, but saving money isn't reliably one
of them.
I agreed with you until last year, but the very low mortgage interest rates and
fitting in
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 19:54:34 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:44:35 -0400, John Colvin
john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not ready to roll out as the energy of the future, but in
certain circumstances it's a good deal for an individual.
It's not a
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 21:29:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/11/2013 2:19 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Define financially better off :)
You have mo' moolah. Is their any other definition?
And this is not even a fair conversation, because there are so
many variables to
consider.
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 21:29:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I can't even recall anyone remembering that selling a house
costs you a 6% commission to the real estate agent. Poof! There
goes a big chunk of your profits right off the top.
This is a peeve of mine. I don't see my house as a
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 20:02:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/11/2013 12:21 PM, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 18:47:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/11/2013 8:28 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
It is great stuff, solar power is almost free money if you
can wait 20 years for
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 21:21:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
For example, my daily driver is an '89 Bronco II.
Had to look that up on wikipedia. Yikes, don't corner too fast in
that thing, we need you alive!
On 6/11/13 5:29 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/11/2013 2:19 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Define financially better off :)
You have mo' moolah. Is their any other definition?
And this is not even a fair conversation, because there are so many
variables to
consider.
I'd like to pop that
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:33:03 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1g47df/dconf_2013_metaprogramming_in_the_real_world_by/
Hackernews: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5861237
Twitter:
On 6/11/2013 2:55 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
...and if you sell it, unless you own multiple houses, you're now homeless. And
housing prices are up, so getting a new house will erase the gains you got from
selling the old house!
Yeah, I love that one.
But I do feel the house is worth it
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:29:45 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 6/11/2013 2:19 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Define financially better off :)
You have mo' moolah. Is their any other definition?
Cash is not always the only consideration. Equity has value.
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:51:08 -0400, John Colvin
john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 19:54:34 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:44:35 -0400, John Colvin
john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not ready to roll out as the energy of
On 6/11/2013 6:54 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:29:45 -0400, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
On 6/11/2013 2:19 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Define financially better off :)
You have mo' moolah. Is their any other definition?
Cash is not always
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 21:55:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
...and if you sell it, unless you own multiple houses, you're
now homeless. And housing prices are up, so getting a new house
will erase the gains you got from selling the old house! So I
don't think raising property values makes
On 6/11/2013 6:54 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
My profit on my first condo, which I bought in '99 and sold in '05 was 150% of
the *purchase price*. Minus the 6% commission :) Although, it was only 3%
because a family friend who is a real estate agent did not charge me her half.
And I only
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:36:11 -0400, Jesse Phillips
jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 21:55:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
...and if you sell it, unless you own multiple houses, you're now
homeless. And housing prices are up, so getting a new house will erase
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:40:29 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 6/11/2013 6:54 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
My profit on my first condo, which I bought in '99 and sold in '05 was
150% of
the *purchase price*. Minus the 6% commission :) Although, it was
only 3%
44 matches
Mail list logo
