I was wondering if Walter or Andrei would respond to this thread.
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 08:37:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I agree with your post, I just want to make a couple of minor
corrections.
What exactly do you agree with Luca about, considering all your
"minor corrections" basica
Am 29.06.2013 23:14, schrieb Leandro Motta Barros:
Wow, looks like the Portuguese-speaking D community is larger than I
thought! How many are we here? I counted three or four in the thread!
:-)
LMB, speaker of Brazilian Portuguese (don't know if this is "weird" or
"real" Portuguese :-P)
On Sat
On 6/29/2013 7:56 PM, CJS wrote:
Wow. That's interesting reading. Thanks for the history lesson!
There are other versions of this history, none of which mention the role ZTC++
played in C++ attaining critical mass, so I like to repeat my version now and
then :-)
On 6/29/2013 9:10 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Even when extremely interesting, I think the ZTC++ history before open
source existed or was really viable (the free software movement started
in 1983, the FSF was founded in 1985 and the open source definition was
made in 1998) is irrelevant in term
On 6/29/2013 5:08 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 08:37:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The bottom line was the open source movement was not a very significant force
in the 1980's when C++ gained traction. Open source really exploded around
2000, along with the inter
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 08:37:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I agree with your post, I just want to make a couple of minor
corrections.
On 6/27/2013 4:58 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Do you really think C++ took off because there are commercial
implementations?
I got into the C++ fray in
Wow, looks like the Portuguese-speaking D community is larger than I
thought! How many are we here? I counted three or four in the thread!
:-)
LMB, speaker of Brazilian Portuguese (don't know if this is "weird" or
"real" Portuguese :-P)
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Geancarlo Rocha wrote:
>
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 08:47:14 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Maybe some help from "proper" Portuguese as well? :)
--
Paulo
Ei gajo, did you mean "weird" portuguese? :P
Thank you! I consider this a great work of charity. Hopefully
this will make it easier to introduce new people to D.
Walter Bright, el 29 de June a las 01:37 me escribiste:
> The bottom line was the open source movement was not a very
> significant force in the 1980's when C++ gained traction. Open
> source really exploded around 2000, along with the internet. I
> wonder if open source perhaps needed the internet
On 2013-06-23 22:24, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
As some of you might know Michel Fortin created a fork of DMD a couple
of years ago which add support for using Objective-C classes and calling
Objective-C method. That is making D ABI compatible with Objective-C.
I have now updated it to the latest ver
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 08:37:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The bottom line was the open source movement was not a very
significant force in the 1980's when C++ gained traction. Open
source really exploded around 2000, along with the internet. I
wonder if open source perhaps needed the inte
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 02:35:27 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
That sounds great! :) Somebody else had started a translation
last year to Brazilian Portuguese. I have just emailed the
author to see how much they have advanced.
Please let me know later how the translation is going, if I can
con
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 07:54:30 UTC, Graham St Jack wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 00:59:15 +0200, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 00:10:37 UTC, Graham St Jack
wrote:
Having side-by-side comparisons of D against bash scripts and
C++
modules had the effect of turning almost al
Am 22.06.2013 13:04, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
> Two additional notes:
>
> - There is a known bug that causes multiple DUB invocations to be
>required until all indirect dependencies are installed (watch out
>for a "There are still some actions to perform:" message). The
>current git mast
Am 29.06.2013 04:35, schrieb Ali Çehreli:
On 06/28/2013 07:15 PM, MattCoder wrote:
> I'm really thinking about translate to portuguese
That sounds great! :) Somebody else had started a translation last year
to Brazilian Portuguese. I have just emailed the author to see how much
they have advan
I agree with your post, I just want to make a couple of minor corrections.
On 6/27/2013 4:58 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Do you really think C++ took off because there are commercial
implementations?
I got into the C++ fray in the 1987-88 time frame. At the time, there was a
great debate bet
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:02:25 -0700
schrieb Ali Çehreli :
> I have continued with the translation of the book. There are 82 of
> the 718 pages still to be translated. (However, I still need to write
> the UDA chapter.)
>
> Ali
Nice work!
BTW: The link to wiki4d on this page
http://ddili.org/ders
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 00:59:15 +0200, John Colvin wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 00:10:37 UTC, Graham St Jack wrote:
>> Having side-by-side comparisons of D against bash scripts and C++
>> modules had the effect of turning almost all the other team members
>> into D advocates.
>
> Any chance
On 6/28/2013 9:10 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 28 June 2013 at 16:00:57 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Deimos is an overhead which provides no benefits. It was supposed to
be used to make discovery easy, but discovery can be done through a
wiki, or dlang.org, or an automated process (dub).
Deimo
On 6/28/2013 7:35 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Thinking that it is free enough, I had chosen this:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/
Just let me know if it is limiting in any way.
This is just awesome! Thank you, Ali!
21 matches
Mail list logo
