You can get free certificates from StartSSL.
Thanks, that's actually cool :-) Unfortunately it does not work
for my dyndns domain. (I can't register vhios.dyndns.org, only
dyndns.org would be accepted)
Walter,
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 14:59 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/22/2013 3:39 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
The title says it all really.
Need linky!
Did John Colvin's reply suffice?
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder
Vote up!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1j1i30/increasing_the_d_compiler_speed_by_over_75/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6103883
Andrei
Andrei Alexandrescu:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1j1i30/increasing_the_d_compiler_speed_by_over_75/
Where is the 75% value coming from?
Regarding the hashing, maybe a different hashing scheme, like
Python dicts hashing could be better.
Regarding Don's problems with memory
On 7/25/2013 11:21 AM, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1j1i30/increasing_the_d_compiler_speed_by_over_75/
Where is the 75% value coming from?
Not sure what you mean. Numbers at the end of the article.
Regarding the hashing, maybe a
The biggest compile time killer in my experience is actually
running out of memory and hitting the swap.
My work app used to compile in about 8 seconds (on Linux btw).
Then we added more and more stuff and it went up to about 20
seconds. It uses a fair amount of CTFE and template stuff,
On 7/25/2013 11:30 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
The biggest compile time killer in my experience is actually running out of
memory and hitting the swap.
My work app used to compile in about 8 seconds (on Linux btw). Then we added
more and more stuff and it went up to about 20 seconds. It uses a
On Thursday, 25 July 2013 at 19:07:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/25/2013 11:30 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
The biggest compile time killer in my experience is actually
running out of
memory and hitting the swap.
My work app used to compile in about 8 seconds (on Linux btw).
Then we added
On 7/25/2013 12:26 PM, qznc wrote:
if you know the lifetime of the objects.
Aye, there's the rub!
And woe to you if you get that wrong.
Walter Bright:
It's not the hashing that's slow. It's the lookup that is.
By different hashing scheme I meant different strategies in
resolving hash collisions, likes double hashing, internal
hashing, cuckoo hashing, and so on and on. Maybe one of such
alternative strategies is more fit
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.comwrote:
On 7/25/2013 11:21 AM, bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
http://www.reddit.com/r/**programming/comments/1j1i30/**
On 7/25/2013 11:49 AM, Dmitry S wrote:
I am also confused by the numbers. What I see at the end of the article is
21.56 seconds, and the latest development version does it in 12.19, which is
really a 43% improvement. (Which is really great too.)
21.56/12.19 is 1.77, i.e. a 75% improvement in
On Thursday, July 25, 2013 14:25:20 Walter Bright wrote:
Also, computing the hash is done exactly once, in the lexer. Thereafter, all
identifiers are known only by their handles, which are (not coincidentally)
the pointer to the identifier, and by its very nature is unique.
I've always thought
On 7/25/2013 3:54 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Like string interning?
Exactly.
After a few weeks of not getting around to it, here's my second
post:
http://foreach-hour-life.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/the-first-corner-n-for-echo.html
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:04:10 +0200
Brad Anderson e...@gnuk.net wrote:
On Thursday, 25 July 2013 at 18:03:22 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1j1i30/increasing_the_d_compiler_speed_by_over_75/
I propose we always refer to compiling as doing the nasty
On 7/25/2013 4:15 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 25 de July a las 14:27 me escribiste:
On 7/25/2013 11:49 AM, Dmitry S wrote:
I am also confused by the numbers. What I see at the end of the article is
21.56 seconds, and the latest development version does it in 12.19, which is
In IT speed is time. Weight, volume and size are bytes. Kilo- is
1024. And other non-SI weird stuff.
In IT speed is time.
That's probably because IT folks are loose with units. Though
pedantism is ok.
19 matches
Mail list logo
