On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 00:30:30 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Andrew Edwards:
When submitting bug reports associated with this review,
ensure they are earmarked [REG2.065-b1] or [BUG2.065-b1] for
easy identification, retrieval and merger.
So far I am not finding many bugs in this. But when
P.S. I really recommend to stop naming relevant dub package
`phobosx` and give it own name. You only harm its discoverability
that way and spread confusion about its official state.
On Monday, 20 January 2014 at 23:18:43 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Too bad they banned me for the horrible crime of saying that
PHP scaled. Because, you know, it is used by Wikipedia and
Facebook. Not sure I want to contribute.
Also, they have a D part in the forum, that used to be alive.
Now it
On Monday, 20 January 2014 at 13:34:28 UTC, Olivier Pisano wrote:
Hi all,
The French programming website developpez.com announces the
opening soon of a section on the D programming language and
calls out for contributions[1]!
That's a good new !
On 2014-01-21 10:26, Dicebot wrote:
It sits in the very same niche as this proposal and has
even worse implementation with plenty of reported bugs.
If it has plenty of reported bugs someone is/was using it ;)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 16:51:08 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-01-21 10:26, Dicebot wrote:
It sits in the very same niche as this proposal and has
even worse implementation with plenty of reported bugs.
If it has plenty of reported bugs someone is/was using it ;)
Or tried to
On 2014-01-21 18:48, Dicebot wrote:
Or tried to use it and ran away thinking that Phobos quality just
laughable. Or wrote a replacement for it which did not pass the review ;)
At least they filed a bug report.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Andrew Edwards wrote:
Beta testing for dmd 2.065 is under way. You can access the associated
zip at [1] and view the current list of regressions at [2]. Make every
effort to provide a thorough review so we can get the best product out
the door.
Please refrain from discussing the review
Le 21/01/2014 00:51, Adam Wilson a écrit :
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:16:42 -0800, Robert jfanati...@gmx.at wrote:
Thank you Dicebot for stepping up. Unfortunately the demand seems to
be very, very low, so I believe we are going to stick with the old
std.signals.
Thanks again!
Best regards,
On 1/21/14, 2:20 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Can we *please* have a well-established, useful, naming scheme for tags and
packages? 2.064beta3, 2.064beta4, 2.064.2, 2.065-b1... Are you as frustrated as
me?
I was just in the process of addressing this. Based on recent issues
with using the packaging
On Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 09:51:57 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
On Thursday, 9 January 2014 at 22:53:02 UTC, qznc wrote:
For the visitation API design: Your map approach (bool[Vertex]
m_visited) is probably the most generic one.
A variant, where the nodes store the flag internally is
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 09:45:20 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
On Monday, 20 January 2014 at 23:18:43 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Too bad they banned me for the horrible crime of saying that
PHP scaled. Because, you know, it is used by Wikipedia and
Facebook. Not sure I want to contribute.
Also,
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 20:48:27 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 1/21/14, 2:20 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Can we *please* have a well-established, useful, naming scheme
for tags and
packages? 2.064beta3, 2.064beta4, 2.064.2, 2.065-b1... Are you
as frustrated as
me?
I was just in the
Due to building an packaging requirements and a need to address the
concerns of the community, I changed the naming convention for this and
all future releases.
The following is our new naming convention:
major.minor.qualifier
Examples follow:
#.###.b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 22:22:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Due to building an packaging requirements and a need to address
the concerns of the community, I changed the naming convention
for this and all future releases.
The following is our new naming convention:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
Please use the one in windows/dinstaller.nsi (I need to get some free time to
unify that with Jordi's windows installer in the linux folder).
Windows installer from Linux folder is out of the building process. The only
one windows installer is in
If we upgrade the version scheme, we can remove the initial zero too:
2.65.b1
2.65.rc1
2.65.0
2.65.1
--
Jordi Sayol
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# == 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
#.###.0 == 2.065.0 // initial release
#.###.# == 2.065.1 // hotfix
On Debian, 2.065.rc1 is bigger than
Jordi Sayol, el 22 de January a las 00:16 me escribiste:
If we upgrade the version scheme, we can remove the initial zero too:
2.65.b1
2.65.rc1
2.65.0
2.65.1
Why not use semver? http://semver.org/
2.65.0-b1
2.65.0-rc1
2.65.0
2.65.1
For Debian packages simply s/-/~/ and everything works
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:06:31 -0500, Andrew Edwards rid...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# == 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
#.###.0 == 2.065.0 // initial
On 1/21/14, 5:22 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note: An installer is not yet prepared for Windows.
It is now added: ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.b1.exe
On 1/21/14, 5:29 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 22:22:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note: An installer is not yet prepared for Windows.
Let me know if you need any guidance on getting the Windows installer
working. Please use the one in windows/dinstaller.nsi (I
Andrew Edwards wrote in message news:lbmru9$290b$1...@digitalmars.com...
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.b1.zip
While you're at it, can we get per-platform zips? Just take the normal zip
and delete all but one platform.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1vtm2l/so_you_want_to_write_your_own_language_dr_dobbs/
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Leandro Lucarella l...@llucax.com.arwrote:
Jordi Sayol, el 22 de January a las 00:16 me escribiste:
If we upgrade the version scheme, we can remove the initial zero too:
2.65.b1
2.65.rc1
2.65.0
2.65.1
Why not use semver? http://semver.org/
+1
On 2014-01-21 21:10, Xavier Bigand wrote:
We use std.signals on DQuick, signals are critical for a GUI system, but
there is no advanced GUI library written completely in D for the moment.
For the moment DQuick still have a long way to do before really needing
something better.
What does the
26 matches
Mail list logo
