On 2014-01-22 01:19, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Why not use semver? http://semver.org/
2.65.0-b1
2.65.0-rc1
2.65.0
2.65.1
Then you would have versions number looking like this:
3.0.0
4.0.0
5.0.0
If we don't want to add a fourth digit.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
El 22/01/14 02:06, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# == 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
#.###.0 == 2.065.0 // initial release
#.###.# == 2.065.1
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 08:25:05 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
I prefer:
2.65~b1
2.65~rc1
because 2.65.0 and 2.65 are bigger than 2.65~rc1,
regardless if qualifier number is present or not in final
release version.
I think that, as much as possible, we should use exactly the
same
On 2014-01-21 23:22, Andrew Edwards wrote:
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.b1.zip
I manged to open this with the zip moulde in Tango now :) The previous
beta failed.
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.b1.dmg
The installer is old. The text contains links to D1. The content
El 22/01/14 09:31, deadalnix ha escrit:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 08:25:05 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
I prefer:
2.65~b1
2.65~rc1
because 2.65.0 and 2.65 are bigger than 2.65~rc1, regardless if
qualifier number is present or not in final release version.
I think that, as much as
On 2014-01-22 05:29, Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1vtm2l/so_you_want_to_write_your_own_language_dr_dobbs/
From the article: Regex is just the wrong tool for lexing and parsing.
I'm wonder why is there so many books about implementing compilers that
Walter Bright:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1vtm2l/so_you_want_to_write_your_own_language_dr_dobbs/
Thank you for the simple nice article.
The poisoning approach. [...] This is the approach we've been
using in the D compiler, and are very pleased with the results.
Yet,
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 10:36:31 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
I'm wonder why is there so many books about implementing
compilers that spends, usually, quite a large chapter about
regular expressions?
I wonder about that too. For anything halfway useful regex has
too much
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 04:29:05 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1vtm2l/so_you_want_to_write_your_own_language_dr_dobbs/
A good syntax needs redundancy in order to diagnose errors and
give good error messages.
This is also true of natural
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 04:29:05 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1vtm2l/so_you_want_to_write_your_own_language_dr_dobbs/
Great article!
Chris:
A good syntax needs redundancy in order to diagnose errors and
give good error messages.
I'd like to measure this statement experimentally: are error
messages in Go and Scala any worse because of the optional use of
semicolons? My initial supposition is that the answer is negative.
On 1/22/14, 3:38 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-01-21 23:22, Andrew Edwards wrote:
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.b1.dmg
The installer is old. The text contains links to D1. The content seem to
be correct though. How are you building the installer.
That might be the case. I'm
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 04:29:05 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1vtm2l/so_you_want_to_write_your_own_language_dr_dobbs/
Great article. I was surprised that you mentioned lowering
positively, though.
I think from DMD we have enough experience
Andrew Edwards, el 21 de January a las 20:06 me escribiste:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# == 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
#.###.0 == 2.065.0 // initial release
#.###.#
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 11:59:30 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I'd like to measure this statement experimentally: are error
messages in Go and Scala any worse because of the optional use
of semicolons? My initial supposition is that the answer is
negative.
Error messages in SML are either
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 20:48:27 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 1/21/14, 2:20 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Can we *please* have a well-established, useful, naming scheme
for tags and
packages? 2.064beta3, 2.064beta4, 2.064.2, 2.065-b1... Are you
as frustrated as
me?
I was just in the
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 10:38:40 UTC, bearophile wrote:
In Haskell the GHC compiler goes one step further, it
translates all the Haskell code into an intermediate code named
Core, that is not the language of a virtual machine, it's still
a functional language, but it's simpler, lot
On 2014-01-22 13:16, Andrew Edwards wrote:
That might be the case. I'm following the instructions here:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/tree/master/osx
Last update was over 9 months ago.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/pull/44
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2014-01-21 23:22, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Due to building an packaging requirements and a need to address the
concerns of the community, I changed the naming convention for this and
all future releases.
I'm getting some regressions when compiling Tango. I filed one bug
report but having
The new std.signal is IMHO far better than the old one. Why not
simply replace it, and then look forward to future improvements?
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 10:38:40 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1vtm2l/so_you_want_to_write_your_own_language_dr_dobbs/
Thank you for the simple nice article.
The poisoning approach. [...] This is the approach we've been
using
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 14:18:15 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
The new std.signal is IMHO far better than the old one. Why not
simply replace it, and then look forward to future improvements?
Guys, were are you was a few days ago when voting still was open?!
Dicebot, can we continue voting
ilya-stromberg píše v St 22. 01. 2014 v 14:38 +:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 14:18:15 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
The new std.signal is IMHO far better than the old one. Why not
simply replace it, and then look forward to future improvements?
Guys, were are you was a few days ago when
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 14:38:48 UTC, ilya-stromberg
wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 14:18:15 UTC, Dejan Lekic
wrote:
The new std.signal is IMHO far better than the old one. Why not
simply replace it, and then look forward to future
improvements?
Guys, were are you was a few
Am Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:18:14 +
schrieb Dejan Lekic dejan.le...@gmail.com:
The new std.signal is IMHO far better than the old one. Why not
simply replace it, and then look forward to future improvements?
Phobos has a very strict don't break backwards compatibility rule.
IMHO too strict, but
On 1/22/2014 4:53 AM, Don wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 04:29:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1vtm2l/so_you_want_to_write_your_own_language_dr_dobbs/
Great article. I was surprised that you mentioned lowering positively, though.
I think
On 1/22/2014 3:40 AM, Chris wrote:
Syntax is getting simplified due to the fact that the listener knows what we
mean, e.g. buy one get one free. I wonder to what extent languages will be
simplified one day. But this is a topic for a whole book ...
There was this article recently:
Don:
Could you give an example? We've tried very hard to avoid
useless error messages, there should only be one error message
for each bug in the code.
Parser errors still generate a cascade of junk, and the cannot
deduce function from argument types message is still painful
-- is that what
Am 22.01.2014 14:28, schrieb Dejan Lekic:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 10:38:40 UTC, bearophile wrote:
In Haskell the GHC compiler goes one step further, it translates all
the Haskell code into an intermediate code named Core, that is not the
language of a virtual machine, it's still a
Le 22/01/2014 08:43, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
On 2014-01-21 21:10, Xavier Bigand wrote:
We use std.signals on DQuick, signals are critical for a GUI system, but
there is no advanced GUI library written completely in D for the moment.
For the moment DQuick still have a long way to do before
I figured I would share this project here since I wrote it in D
and this is a D forum! I basically built two small programs to
send and get a computer's IP using gmail as the static source. It
would've been simpler to implement with some shell scripts, but I
wanted to get practice using other
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 15:44:07 UTC, Johannes Pfau
wrote:
Phobos has a very strict don't break backwards compatibility
rule.
IMHO too strict, but that's the way it is.
This is also the reason why I would have voted no if I made it
in time. Documentation and implementation can be
On 1/22/14 4:53 AM, Don wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 04:29:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1vtm2l/so_you_want_to_write_your_own_language_dr_dobbs/
Great article. I was surprised that you mentioned lowering positively,
though.
I think from
On 1/22/14 6:57 AM, Dicebot wrote:
We can schedule another review / voting relatively soon though, assuming
Robert is still willing to push for it.
That would be great, and thanks Robert for being so gracious about it all.
Going forward the best way to improve Phobos is to ratchet quality by
On 1/22/2014 3:21 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
My understanding is that your concern is related to the stage at which lowering
is performed, which I'd agree with.
I also think we did a slap-dash job of it, not that the concept is wrong.
On 1/22/14 12:15 PM, Ben wrote:
I figured I would share this project here since I wrote it in D and this
is a D forum! I basically built two small programs to send and get a
computer's IP using gmail as the static source. It would've been simpler
to implement with some shell scripts, but I
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 02:12:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/22/14 12:15 PM, Ben wrote:
I figured I would share this project here since I wrote it in
D and this
is a D forum! I basically built two small programs to send and
get a
computer's IP using gmail as the static source.
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 03:34:40 UTC, Andrew Edwards
wrote:
On 1/21/14, 5:22 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note: An installer is not yet prepared for Windows.
It is now added: ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.b1.exe
This of course is relying on the zip file getting uploaded to
We can schedule another review / voting relatively soon though,
assuming Robert is still willing to push for it.
Well, I am definitely motivated now that there is some reaction.
Although my wife is currently giving birth, so can't really
estimate how soon I will get to it, but then I will
39 matches
Mail list logo
