On 31/03/14 06:56, Brian Rogoff wrote:
I made a first pass through. I notice that almost every 'alias' is of
the form
alias existing_name new_name;
I thought that in the latest D the alias syntax was
alias new_name = existing_name;
Should I be following Walter's lead with respect to
On Sunday, 30 March 2014 at 20:43:52 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Sounds like wasted effort, why improve tools for parsing C++
instead
of improving tools for parsing D?
If the lexer is the culprit (though there's no proof for it),
improving C lexer can help improve D lexer.
I requested for D to be added to the package repository of the
Windows package manager Npackd.[1]
It would be nice if someone more experienced in the usage of D
could test and comment on the installation performed by Npackd.
[1]
On 3/30/14, 5:01 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
ixid, el 30 de March a las 20:04 me escribiste:
On Sunday, 30 March 2014 at 19:28:20 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/30/2014 10:08 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 28 March 2014 at 21:16:29 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
It could be useful for me just this
On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 14:46:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It's quite obvious. The D codebase is smaller and simpler than
clang pp's and can be taken many places; the next thing I'll
work on is multithreaded preprocessing that shares already
opened files. One thing that is
Just couldn't let these primary issues pass by that easily..
http://mono-d.alexanderbothe.com/improved-conditional-highlighting-completion-v1-8-1/
Cheers everyone
On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 17:11:48 UTC, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 28.03.2014 19:27, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
Facebook is open-sourcing warp, a fast C and C++ preprocessor
written by
Walter Bright.
currently any ideas why clang could be 40% faster?
justme, el 31 de March a las 03:25 me escribiste:
On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 00:09:34 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I think that's pretty wasteful, why won't you just use clang?
What's the
point of competing with another opensource project (a very good
one,
that took a lot of men-hour to do
On 3/31/2014 10:50 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Don't take the couple of weeks too literally, this is just my
impression after reading the article! Maybe it would be good if Walter
said how much time did it take him to code this.
I spent 2 weeks on the initial version, and another week tuning
Walter Bright:
Since then, I've fixed a handful of bugs, but that didn't
amount to much time.
Have you kept a list of such bugs/mistakes of yours for warp? It
is an interesting list.
Bye,
bearophile
On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 21:16:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/31/2014 2:06 PM, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
Since then, I've fixed a handful of bugs, but that didn't
amount to much time.
Have you kept a list of such bugs/mistakes of yours for warp?
It is an
interesting list.
As usual, thank you for bringing more awesomeness to D :)
Mono-D seems pretty complete to me now, I was wondering if you
are thinking about new major features ?
On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 21:41:26 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
As usual, thank you for bringing more awesomeness to D :)
Mono-D seems pretty complete to me now, I was wondering if you
are thinking about new major features ?
Thanks :)
Well, atm there are too many smaller bugs to fix and little
13 matches
Mail list logo
