On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 at 22:45:45 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:35:18 -0700, Alexander Bothe
wrote:
On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 21:41:26 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
Mono-D seems pretty complete to me now, I was wondering if
you are thinking about new major features ?
http
On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:35:18 -0700, Alexander Bothe
wrote:
On Monday, 31 March 2014 at 21:41:26 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
Mono-D seems pretty complete to me now, I was wondering if you are
thinking about new major features ?
http://mono-d.alexanderbothe.com/mono-d-v1-9-opindexopslice-overloa
I guess the place I'd start is with what CJ Date has been saying about
"Tutorial D" and how much you can rephrase into D.
In someways it's a very orthogonal concept, we tend to think of databases
as "places where we store data".
What Date is saying is, no, they are collections of predicates and a
On 4/16/14, 7:12 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 4/16/14, 1:47 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
I moved the auto-tester to another host and domain name today. It now
lives at:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/
I hate to ask this just after a change already, but... how about moving it to
auto
"Brad Roberts" wrote in message
news:mailman.87.1397638127.2763.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
The only thing I'm sure is broken right now are the old greasemonkey
scripts to
integrate test results with github (the native github build status stuff
works still). I'll get those fixed u
On 4/16/14, 1:47 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
I moved the auto-tester to another host and domain name today. It now
lives at:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/
I hate to ask this just after a change already, but... how about moving
it to auto-tester.dlang.org? -- Andrei
On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 at 13:42:26 UTC, Chris wrote:
Maybe we should "spawn" a new thread for this discussion. I'm
sure this is of interest for everyone on this forum.
All right, here we go:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/khismekcvlbvvyapp...@forum.dlang.org#post-khismekcvlbvvyappyot:40for
On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 at 13:06:56 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
Can you give a concrete example of what features would be
easier if it was built-in?
My point is that multi-threading/concurrency should be very
simple. Go has channels and goroutines and that's it. That does
not make concurrency
Can you give a concrete example of what features would be
easier if it was built-in?
My point is that multi-threading/concurrency should be very
simple. Go has channels and goroutines and that's it. That does
not make concurrency simple, but a lot simpler than when using
locks, semaphores,
On 04/16/2014 01:55 PM, justme wrote:
>
> You may be on to something here.
Maybe I should create a wanted feature list and get started. Any feature
you would like to see?
You may be on to something here.
On Tuesday, 15 April 2014 at 22:27:53 UTC, John Carter wrote:
I was contemplating why languages explode on to the scene or
not, and often
it comes down to a so called "Killer App".
For Ruby, it was Rails.
The ability to construct optimally fast typesafe tuple
Am 16.04.2014 12:18, schrieb Bienlein:
I use vibe.d for a small server side application. It's quite fast,
although we haven't tested it on a larger scale yet. On the downside,
vibe.d's API is not quite intuitive, so it takes a while to get used
to it. But that might be down to the fact that it'
I use vibe.d for a small server side application. It's quite
fast, although we haven't tested it on a larger scale yet. On
the downside, vibe.d's API is not quite intuitive, so it takes
a while to get used to it. But that might be down to the fact
that it's not easy to write an intuitive API
On Tuesday, 8 April 2014 at 21:44:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/22jwcu/how_i_came_to_write_d/
Thanks, this was a fun read! :-)
On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 at 09:10:47 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 16.04.2014 11:05, schrieb Chris:
On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 at 08:21:37 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 April 2014 at 19:19:00 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 11/04/14 12:10, Walter Bright ha escrit:
but hey, now we have D.
Am 16.04.2014 11:05, schrieb Chris:
On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 at 08:21:37 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 April 2014 at 19:19:00 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 11/04/14 12:10, Walter Bright ha escrit:
but hey, now we have D.
Yeah, I like D far better than Java.
+1000
So do I. But for
On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 at 08:21:37 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 April 2014 at 19:19:00 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 11/04/14 12:10, Walter Bright ha escrit:
but hey, now we have D.
Yeah, I like D far better than Java.
+1000
So do I. But for Java there is Hibernate, Hadoop, Cass
I moved the auto-tester to another host and domain name today. It now lives at:
https://auto-tester.puremagic.com/
There's a redirect in place from the old location. There's a reasonable chance I've forgotten to
update something somewhere. If you stumble across anything broken, please sh
On Tuesday, 15 April 2014 at 19:19:00 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 11/04/14 12:10, Walter Bright ha escrit:
but hey, now we have D.
Yeah, I like D far better than Java.
+1000
So do I. But for Java there is Hibernate, Hadoop, Cassandra, DI,
JSF, JMS, JTA, SOAP, REST, vert.x, Quartz, web ser
On 03/13/2014 07:40 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> Looks like most of these are on compiler bugs.
>
> The only Phobos one is the std.getopt one, however its situation is
> two abandoned patches and no clear goal as to what constitutes a
> change worthy of marking the issue as "fixed" and paying ou
20 matches
Mail list logo
