On 8/30/2014 10:19 AM, Casey wrote:
Would it be possible to support bcrypt style password hashing? The one
key feature of it is that it encrypts/hashes the password many times to
slow down brute force attacks. Hash algorithms are too fast to prevent
this.
DAuth is designed for everything to be
On Thursday, 28 August 2014 at 21:20:48 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
- Mouse hovering over an auto keyword will show the resolved
type
- How is this implemented?
- Will this expand to cover any expression at the cursor in the
future? This would be a super promotor for introducing D to
newcomers
On 2014-08-30 14:31, Robert M. Münch wrote:
That's cool stuff.
How will Swift influence this? I'm pretty sure that Apple's strategy is
to get rid of Objective-C ASAP and use Swift whereever possible.
Swift is ABI compatible with Objective-C. So anything that works across
Swift and Objective-
Would it be possible to support bcrypt style password hashing?
The one key feature of it is that it encrypts/hashes the password
many times to slow down brute force attacks. Hash algorithms are
too fast to prevent this.
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 12:44:16 UTC, eles wrote:
Actually, IIRC (not native English speaker here), it was once
told me that the symbol for "I" (first person) is a different
one, something like a half of circle, but in print we use "I"
for convenience, as it is pronounced the same and it
Just a correction:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 10:44:20 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
Since you've already been labelled as a pedant, perhaps you
should learn the difference between pedantry and Nazism.
I meant:
Since you've already labelled *me*
Anyways.
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 11:19:55 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 8/30/2014 5:38 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
˙ǝƃɐnƃuɐן uʍo ɹıǝɥʇ ǝʇıɹʍ ɹo ʞɐǝds pןnoɥs ʎǝɥʇ ʍoɥ uo ǝןdoǝd
ɥsıןƃuƎ
ʇɔǝɹɹoɔ oʇ ƃuıʎɹʇ sʎɐʍןɐ ǝɹɐ ǝןdoǝd ɥsıןƃuƎ-uou ʇɐɥʇ snoıɹɐןıɥ
ʇı puıɟ
sʎɐʍןɐ I
I'm a native English speake
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 11:27:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:44:18 +
safety0ff via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:59:16 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
>
There is no question that failing to capitalize the letter i
when it's us
On 2014-08-29 15:46:32 +, Jacob Carlborg said:
On 2014-08-29 16:06, Szymon Gatner wrote:
If that is indeed the case then this is huge for me. I am doing 32bit
Win apps and their iOS versions. The moment I will be able to use D
libraries on both platforms I will totaly do it. In fact I want
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 16:37:12 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 04:23:28 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 00:32:20 UTC, Mike wrote:
I'm asking this community to consider setting a new precedent
for druntime: reduce the scope to just the language
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 10:49:33 UTC, Mengu wrote:
i will join you in your fight. i do not use upper case letters
when writing both in english and turkish. i find these rules
utterly useless as well.
the funny thing is that there are movements that fight for a
revision of written engl
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:44:18 +
safety0ff via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:59:16 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
>
> Stop being such a grammar nazi.
>
I didn't bring it up because I felt like being pedantic, I
brought it up as a suggestion to make it more plea
On 8/30/2014 5:38 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
˙ǝƃɐnƃuɐן uʍo ɹıǝɥʇ ǝʇıɹʍ ɹo ʞɐǝds pןnoɥs ʎǝɥʇ ʍoɥ uo ǝןdoǝd ɥsıןƃuƎ
ʇɔǝɹɹoɔ oʇ ƃuıʎɹʇ sʎɐʍןɐ ǝɹɐ ǝןdoǝd ɥsıןƃuƎ-uou ʇɐɥʇ snoıɹɐןıɥ ʇı puıɟ
sʎɐʍןɐ I
I'm a native English speaker. Uncapitalized "I" makes a writer come
across like a common leet-spea
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 06:00:31 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:13:23 +
krzaq via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
Negligence to do so is, to me, either extreme laziness or lack
of respect to the reader.
neither, in fact. i believe that those rul
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:59:16 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
Stop being such a grammar nazi.
I didn't bring it up because I felt like being pedantic, I
brought it up as a suggestion to make it more pleasant to read.
Since you've already been labelled as a pedant, perhaps you
should
On 8/30/2014 6:29 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
An update to DAuth is out:
https://github.com/Abscissa/DAuth
Main Changes:
- Add support for DMD 2.066 (Now supports v2.064.2 through v2.066.0)
- Supports crypt(3)-style hash strings for MS5, SHA-256 and SHA-512.
Would you believe *MD5*, not MS5. N
An update to DAuth is out:
https://github.com/Abscissa/DAuth
Main Changes:
- Add support for DMD 2.066 (Now supports v2.064.2 through v2.066.0)
- Supports crypt(3)-style hash strings for MS5, SHA-256 and SHA-512.
- Improved README
- Improved API Reference - now uses ddox.
Full ChangeLog:
https:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:55:37 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 06:00:31 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i believe that those rules are useless and senseless now, so
it's more like a "one man crusade".
It's not a "one man's crusade," it affects legi
On 2014-08-29 23:00, simendsjo wrote:
It's still available at dsource: http://www.dsource.org/projects/ares
I don't think he's referring to Ares, he's referring to some other D
runtime.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2014-08-30 00:40, Szymon Gatner wrote:
But there is still a matter of ARM/iOS runtime correct?
Yes, but that is nothing I'm working on. Although other people are
working on that.
Those merges will go to 2.067?
I have no idea.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 08:39:12 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 00:01:50 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 16:54:18 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 09:43:03 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 06:50:19 UTC, Walter Bright
w
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:59:16 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:55:37 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 06:00:31 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i believe that those rules are useless and senseless now, so
it's more like a "
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 00:01:50 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 16:54:18 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 09:43:03 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 August 2014 at 06:50:19 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I'm judging by both the responses in this thread a
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 07:55:36 +
safety0ff via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> It also appears unprofessional and uneducated.
so i am.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 06:00:31 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i believe that those rules are useless and senseless now, so
it's more like a "one man crusade".
It's not a "one man's crusade," it affects legibility and creates
dissonance within the text.
It also appear
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 07:55:37 UTC, safety0ff wrote:
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 06:00:31 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i believe that those rules are useless and senseless now, so
it's more like a "one man crusade".
It's not a "one man's crusade," it affects legi
Added ebuild:
* dub 0.9.21
Updated ebuilds:
* GDC based on GCC 4.8.3 and DMD FE 2.065
* DMD 2.066.0 and tools
I wonder if I can switch to linking with libphobos2.so now
by default for dmd? Any outstanding issues/objections?
--
Marco
27 matches
Mail list logo
