On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 02:39:23 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 21/03/2015 10:55 a.m., Kingsley wrote:
In preparation for the London D meetup I have got the DTanks
robot
battle framework into the first alpha release state - good
enough to use
at the meetup anyway.
https://github.com/ma
On 21/03/2015 10:55 a.m., Kingsley wrote:
In preparation for the London D meetup I have got the DTanks robot
battle framework into the first alpha release state - good enough to use
at the meetup anyway.
https://github.com/masterthought/dtanks
--K
Are you aware of what turtles are? Because th
Awesome! I'll try this out immediately :)
Any update on how the CV8 support is going in LLVM? It's the only
outstanding detail in the MSCV toolchain right?
On 21 March 2015 at 07:41, Kai Nacke via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> LDC 0.15.2 beta1, the LLVM-based D compiler, is av
"Rainer Schuetze" wrote in message news:mehkf1$21k2$1...@digitalmars.com...
I think we should not do it for the dmd 2.067 release. It would be good
to have it integrated into the test infrastructure before adding it to
the release.
I think that needs to be a hard requirement.
In preparation for the London D meetup I have got the DTanks
robot battle framework into the first alpha release state - good
enough to use at the meetup anyway.
https://github.com/masterthought/dtanks
--K
Hi everyone,
LDC 0.15.2 beta1, the LLVM-based D compiler, is available for
download!
This release is based on the 2.066.1 frontend and standard
library and supports LLVM 3.1-3.6 (OS X: no support for 3.3).
Don't miss to check if your preferred system is supported by this
release. There is ev
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 15:52:18 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It is _supposed_ to be the same, but not necessarily is. Bugs
in CMake generators are not impossible.
Of course not, but I prefer a build system that works 99.99% of
the time regardless of where it is used over a build system that
can o
On Friday, 17 October 2014 at 18:47:54 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 17 October 2014 at 10:39:15 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
New backend why ?
Because I want to code a backend.
I want output C or maybe even Cool ...
generating UML via a backend would also be nice.
Congrats on the project - v i
On 20.03.2015 16:18, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 03/19/2015 08:02 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
The COFF32 lib is built through win64.mak. This is an excerpt from my
build script to create lib32\phobos32mscoff.lib:
set dm_make=c:\l\dmc\bin\make
set vs=vs12
set vcdir=c:\l\%vs%\vc
set cl32=%vcdir%/bin/
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 15:47:09 UTC, Trent Forkert wrote:
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 14:36:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I wasn't referring to the vim vs IDE holy debate. I often use
IDE myself but never use interal build systems tied to IDE -
mostly for portability reasons. It is good to know t
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 14:36:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I wasn't referring to the vim vs IDE holy debate. I often use
IDE myself but never use interal build systems tied to IDE -
mostly for portability reasons. It is good to know that your
project will always be built the same way - on local
On 03/19/2015 08:02 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> The COFF32 lib is built through win64.mak. This is an excerpt from my
> build script to create lib32\phobos32mscoff.lib:
>
> set dm_make=c:\l\dmc\bin\make
> set vs=vs12
> set vcdir=c:\l\%vs%\vc
> set cl32=%vcdir%/bin/cl.exe
> set ar32=%vcdir%/bin/li
On Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 14:45:08 UTC, Trent Forkert wrote:
On Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 11:18:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I call dub from makefile rules and feel pretty comfortable
about such pattern (apart from being not-so-portable compared
to raw dub). And building anything via IDE is just
On 16.03.2015 22:38, Martin Nowak wrote:
Release Candidate for 2.067.0
http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2.x/2.067.0/
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/
You can get the binaries here until they are mirrored.
https://dlang.dawg.eu/downloads/dmd.2.067.0-rc1/
We fixed the few remaining issues.
ht
14 matches
Mail list logo
