Re: Release D 2.069.0

On Saturday, 7 November 2015 at 13:25:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: What can we do when it eats up all 4 gigs? (Windows) With any program, if you're hitting the limit of the 32-bit address space (which is actually more like 3.6 GiB than 4), then you really only have two options - use less

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 14:14:23 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: With a codebase like phobos, compiling in several steps isn't a bad solution. But I am building a parser using pegged, and splitting up the grammar into different modules feels like a no-no. It's an option though. Note that

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 14:22:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote: On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 14:14:23 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: With a codebase like phobos, compiling in several steps isn't a bad solution. But I am building a parser using pegged, and splitting up the grammar into different

Re: Atrium - 3D game written in D

07.11.2015 21:17, Manuel König пишет: Am Fri, 6 Nov 2015 12:04:03 +0300 schrieb Timur Gafarov : Atrium (code name) is a work-in-progress science fiction game with physics based puzzles (gravity effects, force fields, etc) akin to Portal or Inverto. The game is fully

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On 11/03/2015 08:49 PM, Martin Nowak wrote: Glad to announce D 2.069.0. http://dlang.org/download.html http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2.x/2.069.0/ This is the first release with a self-hosted dmd compiler and comes with even more rangified phobos functions, std.experimental.allocator, and

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 18:56:55 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 11/03/2015 08:49 PM, Martin Nowak wrote: Glad to announce D 2.069.0. http://dlang.org/download.html http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2.x/2.069.0/ This is the first release with a self-hosted dmd compiler and comes

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 22:45:05 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote: Actually I think it's fixed now, just disabled. It used to have problems with lib*/scan*, but those are in D now, and most of the allocations from the glue layer are being forwarded to the GC through rmem. If anyone wants to

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 02:15:17 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 11/8/15 2:58 PM, rsw0x wrote: Interestingly, GDC seems *very* popular - it has a 4:1 install rate of gccgo and only trailing slightly behind the golang-go package(reference compiler?) on Ubuntu's popcon. Link? --

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On 9/11/2015 10:25 AM, Jack Stouffer wrote: Is there any reason why this isn't currently used in the front end? Lack of testing, focus on matching c-dmd performance, it used to be blocked and nobody realized it wasn't any more etc.

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On 8/11/2015 1:41 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: IMHO enabling D's GC in the frontend is better way to fix leaking in the CTFE, but there are some issues with that (it segfaults if we enable GC). Actually I think it's fixed now, just disabled. It used to have problems with lib*/scan*, but

Re: 2.069.0 Installation problem with .exe for Windows

On 11/04/2015 10:05 AM, Mike James wrote: > Copied here for extra visibility... > > Hi. > > There seems to be an install problem with the .exe version for > Windows. The installer removes the old DMD then doesn't install > the 2.069.0 version. In the task manager it's still running at > 50% CPU

Re: Release D 2.069.0

On 11/8/15 2:58 PM, rsw0x wrote: Interestingly, GDC seems *very* popular - it has a 4:1 install rate of gccgo and only trailing slightly behind the golang-go package(reference compiler?) on Ubuntu's popcon. Link? -- Andrei