Joakim writes:
>
> I don't understand how the bitcode requirement works on your own
> device: I thought that was for an Apple-submitted app that they then
> compiled to binary themselves? Do you have to go through the same
> process even for test apps, ie no sideloading? Or does the device
> its
On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 08:45:46 UTC, Dan Olson wrote:
Joakim writes:
I don't understand how the bitcode requirement works on your
own device: I thought that was for an Apple-submitted app that
they then compiled to binary themselves? Do you have to go
through the same process even
On Sunday, 27 December 2015 at 21:13:07 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hello again.
please feel free to comment or ask questions here.
Hi.
what languages do you plan to support for input and output ?
On 2015-12-27 00:55, Walter Bright wrote:
Many of the lowerings require semantic information that is not available
from ASTs.
Hence the "in theory" ;). It's hard to tell what would be possible to
implement with AST macros without implementing the complete macro system
and use it. Of course i
On 2015-12-27 17:23, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
That looks pretty cool! -- Andrei
It's based on Haml which is pretty well known as well.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2015-12-28 09:45, Dan Olson wrote:
On implication of Apple requiring bitcode: if Apple is compiling the
bitcode with their clang or llc, then it means using a modifed LLVM like
I do to support thread-locals on watchOS, tvOS, or iOS is only good for
side loading. Probably going to have to wor
On 27 Dec 2015 6:25 PM, "Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/27/15 1:27 AM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[snip]
>> Vibe.d had a template engine called diet which is almost like Jade. It
>> is also completed so yo
On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 10:45:59 UTC, Nick B wrote:
what languages do you plan to support for input and output ?
I just planned on PL/0 as input and C as output.
It is a simple one-pass (okay 2 pass if you count the optimizer)
trans-compilation.
There is no middle-end.
And very littl
Joakim writes:
>
> Thanks for the detailed answer; I'm sure this will now become the
> definitive answer online. I've gone googling for technical info only
> to sometimes be directed back to a post in these D forums. :)
Me too! Its very funny when that happens.
> Time to get emulated TLS for M
Jacob Carlborg writes:
>
> Would it be possible to bypass LLVM and do the thread local specific
> parts in LDC?
That is Plan B.2
On Friday, 25 December 2015 at 17:43:06 UTC, Kingsley wrote:
On Friday, 25 December 2015 at 16:55:32 UTC, Bogdan wrote:
On Friday, 25 December 2015 at 15:28:23 UTC, Pradeep Gowda
wrote:
On Friday, 25 December 2015 at 15:04:42 UTC, eyveer wrote:
On Friday, 25 December 2015 at 13:57:52 UTC, Prade
Last week, I posted in the general forum my dream for better D
docs. Today, about 4 days of work later, I'm about 1/4 of the way
there.
Still a long way to go, but I've already come so far.
First, behold my old dpldocs.info site. Yes, it is still up and
now it ties into my new docs! You can u
On 12/28/15 3:15 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
http://dpldocs.info/
Inspired by the php docs, I also have it able to search direct from a
URL. Click this:
http://dpldocs.info/findSkip
The signature proper is nice. The formatting of "&&" in the constraint
is inconsistent, but I guess that's a matt
One more note: I salute the initiative of another doc generator and read
the motivation behind it. Yet I do think it's worth asking ourselves two
questions:
(a) is the new proposed system differentiated enough to justify its
existence and motivate others to join in?
(b) are the existent syst
On 29/12/15 12:05 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
One more note: I salute the initiative of another doc generator and read
the motivation behind it. Yet I do think it's worth asking ourselves two
questions:
(a) is the new proposed system differentiated enough to justify its
existence and motivate
On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 16:41:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 10:45:59 UTC, Nick B wrote:
what languages do you plan to support for input and output ?
I just planned on PL/0 as input and C as output.
It is a simple one-pass (okay 2 pass if you count the
optimi
Poodinis 6.0.0 has been released!
Poodinis is a dependency injection framework for the D
programming language. It is inspired by the Spring Framework and
Hypodermic IoC container for C++. Poodinis supports registering
and resolving classes either by concrete type or interface.
Automatic injec
http://blog.felixangell.com/implementing-a-programming-language-in-d-part-1/
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3ykko7/implementing_a_programming_language_in_d_lexical/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10802610 (Go through the front page, not
this link, or your votes won't count)
On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 23:40:31 UTC, Nick B wrote:
On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 16:41:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 10:45:59 UTC, Nick B wrote:
what languages do you plan to support for input and output ?
I just planned on PL/0 as input and C as output.
I
On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 23:01:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The signature proper is nice. The formatting of "&&" in the
constraint is inconsistent, but I guess that's a matter with
the formatting of the code.
Yeah, that is a css bug I just forgot about getting in to
everything els
Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> On 29/12/15 12:05 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> One more note: I salute the initiative of another doc generator and read
>> the motivation behind it. Yet I do think it's worth asking ourselves two
>> questions:
>>
>> (a) is the new proposed system differentiated enou
On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 00:50:49 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
so could it be used to produce D output instead of C ?
Could it be used to parse PHP as input ?
That would probably require implementing a vm.
fancyPars can certainly be used to create a php parser but a
straightforward transl
On 29/12/15 4:08 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 29/12/15 12:05 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
One more note: I salute the initiative of another doc generator and read
the motivation behind it. Yet I do think it's worth asking ourselves two
questions:
(a) is the new
On 12/28/2015 04:28 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3ykko7/implementing_a_programming_language_in_d_lexical/
Although the author does not use many D idioms, I've just learned
(re-learned?) anonymous enums from that code.
I've realized that with a nes
On 12/28/2015 09:57 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> anonymous enums
Wow! They are pretty weird:
1) The second form of the AnonymousEnumDeclaration spec is redundant, right?
http://dlang.org/spec/enum.html#AnonymousEnumDeclaration
enum : EnumBaseType { EnumMembers }
enum { EnumMembers }
25 matches
Mail list logo
