It was a somewhat slow week on the forums so I decided to spend a
little extra time on this week's tip (though it quickly struck
midnight so I might revisit this again next week).
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/2016-feb-21.html
There's a fairly big example with comments too. After a couple
On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:21:51 -0800, Brad Roberts via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> Making it an application that is part of the build
> rather than a plug in to ldc would make it available to both dmd and gdc
> users, no?
And it would sidestep issues where I run dstep on one platform and try
On Sunday, 21 February 2016 at 22:23:10 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Sunday, 21 February 2016 at 17:21:51 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
Is there anything preventing Calypso from turning into a code
and interface generator? Making it an application that is
part of the build rather than a plug in to ldc
AFAIK 3.8 received some recent win64 codegen bugfixes.
On Thursday, 18 February 2016 at 23:48:44 UTC, Elie Morisse wrote:
Calypso classes deriving from DMD ones will have to be
converted to D […]
This is not necessarily true. You should be able to inherit from
an extern(C++) class just fine on the C++ side. Of course, Walter
is busy converting
Though fully automatic generation of bindings will be very
difficult because DMD uses semantics deviating from that of C++,
which will require some heuristic analysis.
On Sunday, 21 February 2016 at 17:21:51 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
Is there anything preventing Calypso from turning into a code
and interface generator? Making it an application that is part
of the build rather than a plug in to ldc would make it
available to both dmd and gdc users, no?
On 2/21/2016 9:09 AM, Elie Morisse via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Saturday, 20 February 2016 at 17:34:48 UTC, Nicolas F. wrote:
This is really cool and an interesting project, though I've got one
concern: How will this fit in with the rest of the C++ efforts done
upstream? (...) or is the
On Saturday, 20 February 2016 at 17:34:48 UTC, Nicolas F. wrote:
This is really cool and an interesting project, though I've got
one concern: How will this fit in with the rest of the C++
efforts done upstream? (...) or is the goal to upstream these
changes and make them an officially