On Sunday, 4 September 2016 at 17:18:10 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
Hi all!
LLVM 3.9 has been released! See the release notes here:
http://www.llvm.org/releases/3.9.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Downloads: http://www.llvm.org/releases/download.html#3.9.0
Also note that LDC is mentioned in the release no
Hi all!
LLVM 3.9 has been released! See the release notes here:
http://www.llvm.org/releases/3.9.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
Downloads: http://www.llvm.org/releases/download.html#3.9.0
Also note that LDC is mentioned in the release notes as the only
external project who is already supporting LLV
On Sunday, 4 September 2016 at 08:57:15 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 3 September 2016 at 18:06:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
There are enough ways to leak access to private entity (alias,
template argument, taking address, some compile-time
introspection) to make such optimizations impossible
On Sunday, 4 September 2016 at 08:57:15 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 3 September 2016 at 18:06:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
There are enough ways to leak access to private entity (alias,
template argument, taking address, some compile-time
introspection) to make such optimizations impossible
On Saturday, 3 September 2016 at 18:06:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
There are enough ways to leak access to private entity (alias,
template argument, taking address, some compile-time
introspection) to make such optimizations impossible without
extensive program analysis.
OK, anything else that wou
On Saturday, 3 September 2016 at 18:06:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 3 September 2016 at 14:40:37 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 at 09:56:17 UTC, Johan Engelen
wrote:
(I can only think of complicated stuff that requires pretty
much whole-program analysis to prove va
