On Thursday, 2 February 2017 at 06:50:34 UTC, Suliman wrote:
On Thursday, 2 February 2017 at 05:28:10 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Made a couple more long-needed changes while I'm at it:
https://github.com/Abscissa/mysql-native-experimental
Tag: v0.2.0-preview2
- For better clarity, renamed
On Thursday, 2 February 2017 at 05:28:10 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Made a couple more long-needed changes while I'm at it:
https://github.com/Abscissa/mysql-native-experimental
Tag: v0.2.0-preview2
- For better clarity, renamed `mysql.db.MysqlDB` to
`mysql.pool.MySqlPool`.
- Package
Made a couple more long-needed changes while I'm at it:
https://github.com/Abscissa/mysql-native-experimental
Tag: v0.2.0-preview2
- For better clarity, renamed `mysql.db.MysqlDB` to `mysql.pool.MySqlPool`.
- Package mysql.connection no longer acts as a package.d, publicly
importing other
On 02/01/2017 01:54 PM, Suliman wrote:
Also I can't understand what is SQL Command and what exec is doing if
it's returning ulong?
"struct Command" should not be used. It is old, and a bad design. This
new release attempts to replace it with a better design. Hopefully,
"struct Command"
On 02/01/2017 10:34 AM, Suliman wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 14:06:39 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Am I right understand that Connection instance should created at
constructor and be one single for all class (and it will be reused by
fibers) or am I wrong?
If yes, where I should to close it?
On 02/01/2017 05:04 AM, Suliman wrote:
Plz update dub package on code.dlang.org
It's deliberately not in the main mysql-mative package just yet. I will
put it there once people have a chance to try this, and it becomes clear
there aren't any big problems with the redesign.
For now, this
Also I can't understand what is SQL Command and what exec is
doing if it's returning ulong?
On Wednesday, February 1, 2017, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> As I have previously announced
> (http://forum.dlang.org/post/o6fbbu$1qli$1...@digitalmars.com), I am
> stepping down from maintaining Arch Linux packages for D.
>
> That means
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 14:06:39 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Am I right understand that Connection instance should created
at constructor and be one single for all class (and it will be
reused by fibers) or am I wrong?
If yes, where I should to close it? To put
scope(exit) c.close();
In
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 12:47:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
As I have previously announced
(http://forum.dlang.org/post/o6fbbu$1qli$1...@digitalmars.com), I
am stepping down from maintaining Arch Linux packages for D.
That means there are 3 possibilities:
- No one will adopt them and all
Am I right understand that Connection instance should created at
constructor and be one single for all class (and it will be
reused by fibers) or am I wrong?
If yes, where I should to close it? To put
scope(exit) c.close();
In destructor?
If yes, does it behavior should be same as for
Am 01.02.2017 um 10:46 schrieb aberba:
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 09:35:02 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 31.01.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
The first release of the revamped core module [1] is nearing, and along
with that, a compatible vibe.d release (0.8.0). The new core module is
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 03:43:10 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
Version 1.1.0 of LDC, the LLVM-based D compiler, has finally
been released:
https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/releases/tag/v1.1.0
Great work.
As I have previously announced
(http://forum.dlang.org/post/o6fbbu$1qli$1...@digitalmars.com), I am
stepping down from maintaining Arch Linux packages for D.
That means there are 3 possibilities:
- No one will adopt them and all packages will be moved to AUR
- Some existing Trusted User decided
Awesome!
Plz update dub package on code.dlang.org
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 09:35:02 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 31.01.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
The first release of the revamped core module [1] is nearing,
and along
with that, a compatible vibe.d release (0.8.0). The new core
module is
still opt-in in this release and can
Am 31.01.2017 um 20:38 schrieb Arun Chandrasekaran:
On Tuesday, 31 January 2017 at 11:11:28 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
[1]: https://github.com/vibe-d/vibe-core
Is vibe-core still in alpha stage? Github page says so.
It's de-facto beta stage, but I still need to add a beta tag and update
the
18 matches
Mail list logo
