On 02/09/2017 01:08 AM, Joakim wrote:
I agree that "coercion," or more accurately the tyranny of the default,
is the dominant factor in language popularity even today, but you're
reaching when you apply that to web frameworks too.
Fair enough. It was just another example trying to make the poin
On Wed, 08 Feb 2017 18:27:57 +, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
> 1. Why your company uses D?
You might have specified that this questionnaire is only for people who
use D at work.
I use D for small utilities to help in development. For instance, I used
vibe.d to compare performance with other frame
On Thursday, 9 February 2017 at 00:31:17 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
First beta for the 2.073.1 point release.
This version resolves a few regressions and bugs in the 2.073.0
release.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.073.1.html
Please report any bugs at htt
I'm not going to fill out the questionnaire because I'm not at a
company and have not tried Mir, but two points about what Nick
and Mike wrote.
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 20:40:48 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Coercion (and perceived coercion[1] for that matter) makes
technologies popular
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 18:27:57 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
1. Why your company uses D?
a. D is the best
b. We like D
c. I like D and my company allowed me to use D
d. My head like D
e. Because marketing reasons
f. Because my company can be more efficient with D for some
On 1/30/17 4:48 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Attention fellow Boston D enthusiasts: I have set up a meetup for
February, and Michael Coulombe will give a presentation on his
experiences with shared.
As before, this will be at the Capital One Cafe in the back bay (across
from Prudential center
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 18:27:57 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
1. Why your company uses D?
a. D is the best
b. We like D
c. I like D and my company allowed me to use D
d. My head like D
e. Because marketing reasons
f. Because my company can be more efficient with D for some
First beta for the 2.073.1 point release.
This version resolves a few regressions and bugs in the 2.073.0
release.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.073.1.html
Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org
-Martin
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 22:52:36 UTC, bpr wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 21:41:24 UTC, Mike wrote:
Suggesting D would be an exercise in futility, unless I can
create a notable project in D in my spare time that
demonstrates its advantages and appeal to the masses. I tried
to
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 18:27:57 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
All my current D project are finished. Probably I will use
other languages for production this year, Java/Go/whatever.
N...
I Guess I'll have to try to convince you to help with DCompute
once the necessary compiler stuf
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 21:41:24 UTC, Mike wrote:
Suggesting D would be an exercise in futility, unless I can
create a notable project in D in my spare time that
demonstrates its advantages and appeal to the masses. I tried
to do this 2 years ago, but D failed me, primarily due to
ht
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 18:27:57 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
1. Why your company uses D?
We don't use D.
2. Does your company uses C/C++, Java, Scala, Go, Rust?
C/C++. Currently exploring Rust.
3. If yes, what the reasons to do not use D instead?
* The powers that be in my co
On 02/08/2017 01:27 PM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
1. Why your company uses D?
a. D is the best
b. We like D
c. I like D and my company allowed me to use D
d. My head like D
e. Because marketing reasons
f. Because my company can be more efficient with D for some tasks
then with an
Plus, it can be enchanted during the GSoC 2017.
EDIT: enhanced
1. Why your company uses D?
a. D is the best
b. We like D
c. I like D and my company allowed me to use D
d. My head like D
e. Because marketing reasons
f. Because my company can be more efficient with D for some
tasks then with any other system language
2. Does your company uses C
Am 08.02.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Kagamin:
On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 13:21:18 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Keeping the system overloads would break the safety guarantees at a
relatively deep level and would render the whole effort rather useless
(this is the case for non-scope callbacks only, so if
On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 13:21:18 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Keeping the system overloads would break the safety guarantees
at a relatively deep level and would render the whole effort
rather useless (this is the case for non-scope callbacks only,
so if you stumble over a deprecated function
17 matches
Mail list logo
