On Thursday, 25 May 2017 at 05:17:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Any time one writes an article comparing speed between
languages X and Y, someone gets their ox gored and will
bitterly complain about how unfair the article is (though I
noticed that none of the complainers wrote a faster Python
v
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 21:46:10 UTC, cym13 wrote:
I am disappointed because there are so many good things to say
about this, so many good questions or remarks to make when not
familiar with the language, and yet all we get is "Meh, this
benchmark shows nothing of D's speed against Python"
On 5/24/2017 3:56 PM, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
Its not easy writing an article that doesn't draw some form of criticism. FWIW,
the reason I gave a Python example is because it is very commonly used for this
type of problem and the language is well suited to it. A second reason is that
I've seen se
Hi guys,
I just finished the PR to remove the builtin array properties
.sort and .reverse.
while the dmd changes were trivial fixing all the broken tests
were not.
Even tests that were supposed to call std.algorithm.sort turned
out to use the property by accident; (because of a small error
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 21:46:10 UTC, cym13 wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 21:34:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
It's now #4 on the front page of Hacker News:
https://news.ycombinator.com/news
The comments on HN are useless though, everybody went for the
"DÂ versus Python" thing and se
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 21:34:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
It's now #4 on the front page of Hacker News:
https://news.ycombinator.com/news
The comments on HN are useless though, everybody went for the
"DÂ versus Python" thing and seem to complain that it's doing a
D/Python benchmark whil
It's now #4 on the front page of Hacker News:
https://news.ycombinator.com/news
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 17:36:29 UTC, cym13 wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 13:39:57 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[...snip...]
A bit off topic but I really like that we still get quality
content such as this post on this blog. Sustained quality is
hard job and I thank everyone involved for
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 13:39:57 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Some of you may remember Jon Degenhardt's talk from one of the
Silicon Valley D meetups, where he described the performance
improvements he saw when he rewrote some of eBay's command line
tools in D. He has now put the effort into cr
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 16:27:20 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 16:06:01 UTC, Pradeep Gowda wrote:
Have a look at my summary: https://github.com/wilzbach/linq
This is cool! Thank you.
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 16:06:01 UTC, Pradeep Gowda wrote:
Inspired by Demis Bellot's "Kotlin LINQ examples" [1], I have
started a github repo to port the 101 LINQ examples to D -
https://github.com/btbytes/dlang-linq-examples
So far, I've completed one section on "Restriction Operators".
Inspired by Demis Bellot's "Kotlin LINQ examples" [1], I have
started a github repo to port the 101 LINQ examples to D -
https://github.com/btbytes/dlang-linq-examples
So far, I've completed one section on "Restriction Operators". It
has been a fun exercise. More examples to come!
[1] https
Some of you may remember Jon Degenhardt's talk from one of the
Silicon Valley D meetups, where he described the performance
improvements he saw when he rewrote some of eBay's command line
tools in D. He has now put the effort into crafting a blog post
on the same topic, where he takes D version
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 at 07:25:56 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
It seems that package on webupd8 is still on 1.5.4
Unfortunately I do not maintain the packages, best course of
action would be to drop them a line asking them to update it.
Simply the best !
On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 at 23:35:22 UTC, Gerald wrote:
Tilix 1.5.8 is now available with a number of new features and
bug fixes.
It seems that package on webupd8 is still on 1.5.4
Andrea
16 matches
Mail list logo