Re: Beta 2.076.1

2017-11-04 Thread Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d-announce
Am Sat, 07 Oct 2017 12:45:30 + schrieb Martin Nowak : > On Sunday, 1 October 2017 at 17:36:12 UTC, Marco Leise wrote: > > Other than that I'm happy with the package, as it provides the > > man pages, pre-built HTML documentation and a binary to > > bootstrap dmd on systems that lack a D comp

Re: Reorganization and list of D libraries (300+)

2017-11-04 Thread Fra Mecca via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 12:11:39 UTC, FreeSlave wrote: I checked README.md in this repo. Not sure why my nick is used in place of name of lnk library. Also inilike has nothing to do with argv. Thank you, corrected

Re: Reorganization and list of D libraries (300+)

2017-11-04 Thread Fra Mecca via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 11:26:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: DWT is using the EPL, Eclipse Public License, license. I'm missing the ddb [1] and mysql-native [2] database libraries. There are many list like this for other languages, they're usually called "awesome-" where is the language

Re: Diamond MVC / Template Engine - v2.1.0 Released

2017-11-04 Thread bauss via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 14:43:32 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 14:16:53 UTC, bauss wrote: On Thursday, 2 November 2017 at 22:55:04 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: [...] I don't normally use VS Code, so to create a template for it are there anything specific it must incl

Re: Reorganization and list of D libraries (300+)

2017-11-04 Thread FreeSlave via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 00:12:19 UTC, Fra Mecca wrote: https://github.com/FraMecca/D_Libraries_Registry I checked README.md in this repo. Not sure why my nick is used in place of name of lnk library. Also inilike has nothing to do with argv.

Re: Reorganization and list of D libraries (300+)

2017-11-04 Thread Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 2017-11-04 01:12, Fra Mecca wrote: Hi all. Lurking in this forum I had the feeling that lots of D developers tend to rewrite lots of code that could be found in libraries. This is not bad per se but I thought that one of the reason could have been the current process of library discovery.

Re: Release D 2.077.0

2017-11-04 Thread Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 08:19:17 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 11/3/2017 1:20 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: Sadly array ops would be insufficient for said problem. It wasn’t a direct element wise expression. That sounds like that might be why it failed vectorization :-) As I recall it t

Re: LDC 1.5.0

2017-11-04 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 08:44:12 UTC, codephantom wrote: On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 08:40:19 UTC, Joakim wrote: It is fairly easy to compile ldc yourself: https://wiki.dlang.org/Building_LDC_from_source Have you tried those instructions on 'FreeBSD'? Not those instructions mayb

Re: LDC 1.5.0

2017-11-04 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 02:43:35 UTC, codephantom wrote: On Friday, 3 November 2017 at 17:17:04 UTC, kinke wrote: Hi everyone, on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to finally officially announce LDC 1.5. The highlights of this version in a nutshell: Great stuff. No binary release f

Re: LDC 1.5.0

2017-11-04 Thread codephantom via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 4 November 2017 at 08:40:19 UTC, Joakim wrote: It is fairly easy to compile ldc yourself: https://wiki.dlang.org/Building_LDC_from_source Have you tried those instructions on 'FreeBSD'? Have you ever had to deal with pkg conflicts in FreeBSD? I have ;-(

Re: Release D 2.077.0

2017-11-04 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 11/3/2017 1:20 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: Sadly array ops would be insufficient for said problem. It wasn’t a direct element wise expression. That sounds like that might be why it failed vectorization :-) If you recall the expression, it would be interesting to see it.