Re: Release D 2.078.1

2018-02-09 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 02/01/2018 05:16 PM, Atila Neves wrote: > It'd probably be easier to `executeShell("vcvarsall.bat")` than trying > to replicate the logic in dmd itself. It's bound to get it wrong (as it > has) and we don't have Microsoft's resources to test backwards > compatibility. That was my first suggesti

Release D 2.078.2

2018-02-09 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Glad to announce D 2.078.2. http://dlang.org/download.html This point release fixes a few issues over 2.078.2, see the changelog for more details. http://dlang.org/changelog/2.078.2.html This point release also ships with dub 1.7.2 which further

Re: Official Dub package for DWT

2018-02-09 Thread Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 2018-02-09 04:48, Brian wrote: Thanks! But, How to use x64? On Linux it should just work if you have a 64bit system. On Windows I guess you would run Dub with "dub --arch=x86_64", if it doesn't already default to 64bit. -- /Jacob Carlborg

dxml 0.1.0 released

2018-02-09 Thread Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce
I have multiple projects that need an XML parser, and std_experimental_xml is clearly going nowhere, with the guy who wrote it having disappeared into the ether, so I decided to break down and write one. I've kind of wanted to for years, but I didn't want to spend the time on it. However, sometime

Re: dxml 0.1.0 released

2018-02-09 Thread H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:15:33PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > I have multiple projects that need an XML parser, and > std_experimental_xml is clearly going nowhere, with the guy who wrote > it having disappeared into the ether, so I decided to break down and > writ

Re: dxml 0.1.0 released

2018-02-09 Thread Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, February 09, 2018 13:47:52 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > As for DTDs, perhaps it might be enough to make normalize() configurable > with some way to specify additional entities that may be defined in the > DTD? Once that's possible, I'd say it's Good Enough(tm), since