On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 20:00:45 UTC, Maksim Fomin wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 19:26:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 19:06:52 UTC, Maksim Fomin wrote:
Unlikely, you don't spend $7.5 billion on a company because
you want to send a message that you're a good dev tools
com
On 06/09/2018 08:29 PM, bauss wrote:
On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 23:41:43 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
(I just hope it doesn't lead to GitLab running out of cash too.)
And then Microsoft acquires both and everyone moves to Bitbucket.
Endless cycle :)
Ahhh! Time to make my own then
On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 23:41:43 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
(I just hope it doesn't lead to GitLab running out of cash too.)
And then Microsoft acquires both and everyone moves to Bitbucket.
Endless cycle :)
On 06/09/2018 11:06 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
[1]
https://about.gitlab.com/2018/06/05/gitlab-ultimate-and-gold-free-for-education-and-open-source/
From the link:
"It has been a crazy 24 hours for GitLab. More than 2,000 people tweeted
about #movingtogitlab. We imported over 100,000 repos
Hello, I am glad to announce that new Telegram bot which can
execute D code is up and running!
Check it out here: https://t.me/dlangbot
Features:
- Two compilers to choose from: dmd (default) and ldc
- Support for custom compiler arguments with `/args` command
- It's possible to set program'
Happy to announce version 2.10.0 of Diamond.
This release is primarily a GDPR Security Patch with respect for
privacy during logging, sensitive data detection/validation etc.
Of course as with everything else in Diamond it can be tweaked as
much as you want, or disabled.
Since last announced
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 07:53:13 UTC, drug wrote:
04.06.2018 09:02, Anton Fediushin пишет:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 04:40:44 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On the bright side, maybe this will encourage online repo
hosting to become less of a monopoly as folks move elsewhere
due to their conce
On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 08:35:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The real problem is when employers try to claim anything
unrelated to your job that you do in your free time. _That_ is
completely inappropriate, but some employers try anyway, and
depending on which state you live in and what y
On Sat, 2018-06-09 at 04:03 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via Digitalmars-
d-announce wrote:
>
[…]
> Maybe naive, maybe not, but my policy is that: Any hour of any day an
> employer claims ***ANY*** influence over, must be paid for ($$$) by said
> employer when attempting to make ANY claim o
On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 22:47 -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
[…]
> Oh, employers do try that. I would negotiate what is mine and what is the
> company's, before signing. In particular, I'd disclose all projects I'd
> worked
> on before, and get a specific acknowledgement
On 09/06/2018 9:57 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/9/2018 1:03 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
Maybe naive, maybe not, but my policy is that: Any hour of any day an
employer claims ***ANY*** influence over, must be paid for ($$$) by
said employer when attempting to make ANY claim on that ho
On 6/9/2018 1:03 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
Maybe naive, maybe not, but my policy is that: Any hour of any day an employer
claims ***ANY*** influence over, must be paid for ($$$) by said employer when
attempting to make ANY claim on that hour of my life. Period.
If that's the deal y
On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 15:06 -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On 6/8/2018 3:02 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
> > Essentially (if not actually) everything on github is available through
> > their
> > api's. No need for scraping or other heroics to gather it.
>
> That's good to kn
On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 16:28 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
[…]
>
> If not 2.080.2, I will target master for 2.081. Seems like it was pretty
> much good to go, but didn't make the cutoff.
I'll just go do some more Rust stuff whilst waiting. :-)
--
Russel.
==
On Saturday, June 09, 2018 04:03:40 Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On 06/09/2018 01:47 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> > Oh, employers do try that. I would negotiate what is mine and what is
> > the company's, before signing. In particular, I'd disclose all projects
> > I'd worked
On 06/09/2018 03:56 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 07:06:23 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
Whether web API or web scraping: Either way, you still have to submit
an HTTP request, parse the results according to the format the server
has chosen to spit out, and possibly fol
On 06/09/2018 01:47 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
Oh, employers do try that. I would negotiate what is mine and what is
the company's, before signing. In particular, I'd disclose all projects
I'd worked on before, and get a specific acknowledgement that those were
not the company's. When I'd moonl
On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 07:06:23 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
Whether web API or web scraping: Either way, you still have to
submit an HTTP request, parse the results according to the
format the server has chosen to spit out, and possibly follow
up with additional HTTP requests.
On 06/08/2018 06:02 PM, Brad Roberts wrote:
Essentially (if not actually) everything on github is available through
their api's. No need for scraping or other heroics to gather it.
That does make things a little bit simpler, but web scraping really
isn't all that much more complicated.
Wh
19 matches
Mail list logo