On Friday, 2 November 2018 at 21:04:13 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.13:
Note how fast Martin produced this beta release after the DMD
2.083 release.
Thanks to all contributors!
The main contributor by far is you Martin, thank _you_!
-Johan
On 11/2/2018 5:44 PM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
When one encounters a new idea that's unfamiliar sometimes it's easy to think
that because it's unfamiliar it must be unsound. That can be a mistake. It
might be better to suspend judgement for a while and keep an open mind.
So true. My ideas on how
On Saturday, 3 November 2018 at 20:38:29 UTC, unprotected-entity
wrote:
As has been pointed out several times before, this is a contrived
example. Allow a simple transformation:
```
module test;
struct S
{
private uint a;
void setA(uint n)
{
// damn implicit conversions!
On Saturday, 3 November 2018 at 06:57:50 UTC, Neia Neutuladh
wrote:
We object because the people complaining can't point at a use
case that seems reasonable. If you provided real-world
examples, we'd consider them.
--
module test;
struct S
{
private uint a;
void setA(uint n)
On Saturday, 3 November 2018 at 06:57:50 UTC, Neia Neutuladh
wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 04:50:52 +, unprotected-entity wrote:
(q1) Why is it, that people who use D, object *so much* to the
idea of
allowing (at the choice of the programmer) for a type to have
it's own
private state *within*
On Friday, 2 November 2018 at 21:04:13 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.13:
* Based on D 2.083.0.
* The Windows packages are now fully self-sufficient, i.e., a
Visual Studio/C++ Build Tools installation isn't required
anymore.
* Substantial debug info improvements f
On 03.11.2018 19:33, kinke wrote:
I figured it'd be for a lot of Windows users. Why not explicitly express
your gratitude with a little 'thank you' then? After all, that little
bullet point in the release notes easily took some 40 hours of my spare
time, and some appreciation can work wonders
On Saturday, 3 November 2018 at 00:42:46 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Friday, 2 November 2018 at 21:04:13 UTC, kinke wrote:
* The Windows packages are now fully self-sufficient, i.e., a
Visual Studio/C++ Build Tools installation isn't required
anymore.
That's a very big deal for me. It will be re
On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 11:24:06 +, FooledDonor wrote:
> And if the validity of a person's reasoning is a function of his way of
> expressing them, well ... do not pose to software engineers at least
If you want other people to do work for you, you need to convince them to
do it. This is an open
On Saturday, 3 November 2018 at 06:57:50 UTC, Neia Neutuladh
wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 04:50:52 +, unprotected-entity wrote:
(q1) Why is it, that people who use D, object *so much* to the
idea of
allowing (at the choice of the programmer) for a type to have
it's own
private state *within*
On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 04:50:52 +, unprotected-entity wrote:
> (q1) Why is it, that people who use D, object *so much* to the idea of
> allowing (at the choice of the programmer) for a type to have it's own
> private state *within* a module (so that its private state is respected
> by other code a
11 matches
Mail list logo
