On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 at 04:18:55 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.084.1 point release,
♥ to the 6 contributors.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.084.1.html
As usual please report any bugs at
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.084.1 point release, ♥ to the
6 contributors.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.084.1.html
As usual please report any bugs at
https://issues.dlang.org
-Martin
On Monday, 4 February 2019 at 18:35:37 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Monday, 4 February 2019 at 18:32:56 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
I don't understand this.
What does "(return)?" mean? Is this valid D syntax? What do I
miss?
I meant for that to be interpreted like a Regular expression,
On Monday, 4 February 2019 at 18:32:56 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
I don't understand this.
What does "(return)?" mean? Is this valid D syntax? What do I
miss?
I meant for that to be interpreted like a Regular expression,
denoting conditional presence of the return statement. I'm
On Monday, 4 February 2019 at 17:09:25 UTC, bitwise wrote:
I think this solves all of the above:
fun(10);
==>
(int __temp0){ (return)? fun( __temp0 ); }(10);
-The expression/statement issue is solved by the closure
-The initialization issue created by the ":=" approach is not
present here
On Thursday, 24 January 2019 at 07:18:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Walter and Andrei have declined to accept DIP 1016, "ref T
accepts r-values", on the grounds that it has two fundamental
flaws that would open holes in the language.
fun(10)
==>
{
T __temp0 = void;
fun(__temp0 := 10);
}
