On Saturday, 16 February 2019 at 15:06:51 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.085.0.html
The release candidate is live now.
On Tuesday, 26 February 2019 at 22:34:45 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hi all,
I have some very exciting news to share.
[...]
That is great news! What is not great news is that I am no longer
a student and I couldn't attend to this even though I want to.
On 2/26/19 5:34 PM, Seb wrote:
Hi all,
I have some very exciting news to share.
The D Language Language got accepted as a Google Summer of Code
organization!
A few of us were waiting for permission to announce all day :o).
Congratulations to Mike, Seb, and all others who made our proposal
Hi all,
I have some very exciting news to share.
The D Language Language got accepted as a Google Summer of Code
organization!
The official GSoC page provides a few initial pointers and
details:
https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/organizations/6103365956665344
Below, I will try to answer
On Tuesday, 26 February 2019 at 08:09:00 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Sunday, 24 February 2019 at 22:31:53 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
[...]
I just found this regression for linux and windows, starting
with 2.084.1 and still
occurring in this second beta:
[...]
Issue created
https://issues.dlan
On Tuesday, 26 February 2019 at 12:52:11 UTC, JN wrote:
On Monday, 25 February 2019 at 20:31:43 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
SumType is a generic sum type for modern D. It is meant as an
alternative to
`std.variant.Algebraic`.
Is it a better alternative? Seems like it from the description.
If it'
On Tuesday, 26 February 2019 at 12:52:11 UTC, JN wrote:
On Monday, 25 February 2019 at 20:31:43 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
SumType is a generic sum type for modern D. It is meant as an
alternative to
`std.variant.Algebraic`.
Is it a better alternative? Seems like it from the description.
If it'
On Monday, 25 February 2019 at 20:31:43 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
SumType is a generic sum type for modern D. It is meant as an
alternative to
`std.variant.Algebraic`.
Is it a better alternative? Seems like it from the description.
If it's objectively better on all fronts, perhaps it should be
On Tuesday, 26 February 2019 at 03:56:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/25/2019 7:45 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
I have no idea what people are talking about when they mention
on this forum that D's const is useless. Nearly every function
parameter in my code is `in`. Nearly every variable
declarat
On 2/26/2019 2:32 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What about the __mutable proposal [1]?
[1] https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8315
It hasn't been approved yet, and please start another thread if you want to
discuss it.
On 2019-02-25 01:38, Walter Bright wrote:
D's const has teeth. Nothing can be modified through T.
What about the __mutable proposal [1]?
[1] https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8315
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2019-02-25 21:23, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jacob, are there amends you need to make to the DIP?
No, I'm talking about the process in general.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Monday, 25 February 2019 at 02:29:40 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:25 PM Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
Thanks for letting me know you're abandoning the rvalue ref
DIP.
It's not an "rvalue ref" DIP (which I think has confused a lot
of
people), it's an rva
On Sunday, 24 February 2019 at 10:46:37 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Walter and Andrei have requested the Final Review round be
dropped for DIP 1018, "The Copy Constructor", and have given it
their formal approval. They consider copy constructors a
critical feature for the language.
Walter provide
On Sunday, 24 February 2019 at 22:31:53 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Saturday, 16 February 2019 at 15:06:51 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.085.0 release, ♥ to
the 49 contributors.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.085.0.htm
15 matches
Mail list logo
