Re: intel-intrinsics v1.2.0: Added GDC support, SSE3

2019-10-07 Thread Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 02:30, Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > `intel-intrinsics` is a DUB package for people interested in x86 > performance that want a portable set of intrinsics which works > with all D compilers. > > Available through DUB: > http://code.dlang.org/packages/

intel-intrinsics v1.2.0: Added GDC support, SSE3

2019-10-07 Thread Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d-announce
`intel-intrinsics` is a DUB package for people interested in x86 performance that want a portable set of intrinsics which works with all D compilers. Available through DUB: http://code.dlang.org/packages/intel-intrinsics *** Changelog of v1.2.0 *** - SSE3 intrinsics were implemented. - Add

Re: Reloaded Vibes: Smart auto-reloading service and server for (web) development.

2019-10-07 Thread H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 10:21:08PM +, beyar-123--- via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...] > > On Thursday, 27 June 2019 at 15:50:43 UTC, BN26 wrote: > > > Amazing work! I was looking for something like this. > > > > > > At the moment, I have to rerun dub after every change, it's a pain > > >

Reloaded Vibes: Smart auto-reloading service and server for (web) development.

2019-10-07 Thread beyar-123--- via Digitalmars-d-announce
https://forum.dlang.org/post/nnwxjluqodqayihrd...@forum.dlang.org On Friday, 12 July 2019 at 16:23:35 UTC, 0xEAB wrote: On Thursday, 27 June 2019 at 15:50:43 UTC, BN26 wrote: Amazing work! I was looking for something like this. At the moment, I have to rerun dub after every change, it's a pai

Re: Blog Post: Beating std::visit Without Really Trying

2019-10-07 Thread Arredondo via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 6 October 2019 at 03:47:25 UTC, Seb wrote: Phobos is amazing and stable, but exactly because of these attributes there isn't much active development happening. I thought that the work on dip1000 and the current push for borrow semantics and other lifetime related issues that have c

Re: Blog Post: Beating std::visit Without Really Trying

2019-10-07 Thread Paul Backus via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 7 October 2019 at 08:07:01 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: Where's the breaking change? Are there selections of handlers that work for visit and don't work with match? Yes. https://run.dlang.io/is/UpaY2E

Re: Blog Post: Beating std::visit Without Really Trying

2019-10-07 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 7 October 2019 at 01:38:04 UTC, Paul Backus wrote: Just to clarify: SumType isn't, and was never intended to be, a drop-in replacement for Algebraic. Their interfaces are similar enough that porting code from Algebraic to SumType shouldn't be too difficult, but even within the common

Re: Blog Post: Beating std::visit Without Really Trying

2019-10-07 Thread Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 6 October 2019 at 19:58:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 10/6/2019 2:59 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: Well, so there's hope that _very little_ improvements will be merged, in a way or another? I mean, there's some sort of policy for things like that:    https://github.com/dlang/phobo