Re: Luneta: terminal fuzzy finder

2020-05-04 Thread Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 5/4/20 6:49 PM, Felipe wrote: Hi, I develop an interactive terminal fuzzy finder in D with ncurses. Feel free to check it out and contribute. Any feedback is welcome. Thanks, Felipe [1] https://github.com/fbeline/luneta [2] https://code.dlang.org/packages/luneta [3]

Luneta: terminal fuzzy finder

2020-05-04 Thread Felipe via Digitalmars-d-announce
Hi, I develop an interactive terminal fuzzy finder in D with ncurses. Feel free to check it out and contribute. Any feedback is welcome. Thanks, Felipe [1] https://github.com/fbeline/luneta [2] https://code.dlang.org/packages/luneta [3] https://code.dlang.org/packages/fuzzyd

Re: $750 Bounty: Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should be updated to latest Unicode standard)

2020-05-04 Thread rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 05/05/2020 7:26 AM, notna wrote: Maybe you want to add an additional constraint... It would be great if this would result in a tool, scripts or at least a simple-to-follow to-do (say Wiki?!)... so best case we could use this also for the next updates / releases in the future?! It wouldn't

Re: $750 Bounty: Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should be updated to latest Unicode standard)

2020-05-04 Thread welkam via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:30:41 UTC, Arine wrote: On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:01:01 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote: Besides getting the work done, there is one constraint: The work needs to get into Phobos. It doesn't make sense to have it sit around, because it's not being merged. I don't have

Re: $750 Bounty: Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should be updated to latest Unicode standard)

2020-05-04 Thread notna via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:01:01 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote: Following my "Is it time for a Unicode update of std.uni?" post in D group, I would like to try out to sponsor this effort for "Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should be updated to latest Unicode standard)" [1] So, I'm

Re: $750 Bounty: Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should be updated to latest Unicode standard)

2020-05-04 Thread notna via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 19:26:28 UTC, notna wrote: On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:01:01 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote: Following my "Is it time for a Unicode update of std.uni?" post in D group, I would like to try out to sponsor this effort for "Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should be

Re: $750 Bounty: Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should be updated to latest Unicode standard)

2020-05-04 Thread Robert M. Münch via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 2020-05-04 17:30:41 +, Arine said: I feel like this is going to be the biggest obstacle. I worked on a bug bounty in the past, made a pull request, and it just sat there for months. It's a waste of time to try and get anything merged. Especially on the scale that this would be at.

Re: $750 Bounty: Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should be updated to latest Unicode standard)

2020-05-04 Thread Arine via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 4 May 2020 at 17:01:01 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote: Besides getting the work done, there is one constraint: The work needs to get into Phobos. It doesn't make sense to have it sit around, because it's not being merged. I don't have any clue who is in charge, who decides this. Or if

$750 Bounty: Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should be updated to latest Unicode standard)

2020-05-04 Thread Robert M. Münch via Digitalmars-d-announce
Following my "Is it time for a Unicode update of std.uni?" post in D group, I would like to try out to sponsor this effort for "Issue 16416 - Phobos std.uni out of date (should be updated to latest Unicode standard)" [1] For me, this, too, is an experiment to find out if it's possible to