On Saturday, 16 May 2020 at 00:26:31 UTC, Carl Sturtivant wrote:
On Thursday, 14 May 2020 at 16:57:20 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
[[GCC 11 Development]]
Now the development cycle has started again, I have ambitions
for a number disruptive changes to land during the next
release cycle.
Superb! -
On Thursday, 14 May 2020 at 16:57:20 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
[[GCC 11 Development]]
Now the development cycle has started again, I have ambitions
for a number disruptive changes to land during the next release
cycle.
Superb! --- gdc is perhaps the most important strategically and I
am so gl
.empty and .throw are not that difficult:
see https://code.dlang.org/packages/dshould
On Friday, 15 May 2020 at 12:35:27 UTC, Luis wrote:
On my TODOs list for v0.3 I have :
* Rename module to pijamas
* Add .empty that it's equivalent to .length(0)
* Handle range.should.be.equal([1, 2, 3])
* Tes
On Friday, 15 May 2020 at 14:42:47 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
compiler usually explodes trying to swallow it
https://media.giphy.com/media/tfxgAK370HzEY/giphy.gif
On Thursday, 14 May 2020 at 08:42:43 UTC, ShadoLight wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 May 2020 at 19:25:43 UTC, welkam wrote:
On Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 09:18:04 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Because D is a re-engineering of C++
I thought it was re-engineering of C
This opinion seems quite common in the D
On Friday, 15 May 2020 at 14:42:47 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On Friday, 15 May 2020 at 12:35:27 UTC, Luis wrote:
On my run to raise stuff from dead packages, I come with
Pijamas. A fork from Yamadacpc’s Pyjamas that works with D
frontend 2.090 and forwards.
[...]
I was about to ask what
On Friday, 15 May 2020 at 12:35:27 UTC, Luis wrote:
On my run to raise stuff from dead packages, I come with
Pijamas. A fork from Yamadacpc’s Pyjamas that works with D
frontend 2.090 and forwards.
[...]
I was about to ask what is broken with ctRegex (well except that
compiler usually explod
On 5/14/20 9:26 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
After reading a paper that grabbed his curiosity and wouldn't let go,
Andrei set out to determine if Lomuto partitioning should still be
considered inferior to Hoare for quicksort on modern hardware. This blog
post details his results.
Blog:
https://dlan
On my run to raise stuff from dead packages, I come with Pijamas.
A fork from Yamadacpc’s Pyjamas that works with D frontend 2.090
and forwards.
https://zardoz89.github.io/pijamas/
v0.2.2-beta
Versions v0.2.x must keep being source compatible with Pyjamas.
* Update to DLang frontend 2.090
*
On Thursday, 14 May 2020 at 13:26:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
After reading a paper that grabbed his curiosity and wouldn't
let go, Andrei set out to determine if Lomuto partitioning
should still be considered inferior to Hoare for quicksort on
modern hardware. This blog post details his results
On Friday, 15 May 2020 at 10:28:41 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
One curious question -- unless I've misread things horribly, it
looks like the D benchmarks for Lomuto branch-free are
consistently slower than for C++. Any idea why that is? I
would expect gcc/gdc and clang/ldc to produce
On Thursday, 14 May 2020 at 13:26:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
After reading a paper that grabbed his curiosity and wouldn't
let go, Andrei set out to determine if Lomuto partitioning
should still be considered inferior to Hoare for quicksort on
modern hardware. This blog post details his results
On Thursday, 14 May 2020 at 13:26:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
After reading a paper that grabbed his curiosity and wouldn't
let go, Andrei set out to determine if Lomuto partitioning
should still be considered inferior to Hoare for quicksort on
modern hardware. This blog post details his results
On Thursday, 14 May 2020 at 13:26:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
After reading a paper that grabbed his curiosity and wouldn't
let go, Andrei set out to determine if Lomuto partitioning
should still be considered inferior to Hoare for quicksort on
modern hardware. This blog post details his results
On Friday, 15 May 2020 at 03:22:43 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
On Thursday, 14 May 2020 at 08:42:43 UTC, ShadoLight wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 May 2020 at 19:25:43 UTC, welkam wrote:
[...]
This opinion seems quite common in the D community, but I
frankly don't see it. If you are referring to the D
On 5/14/2020 9:57 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
As of last week (7th May), GCC 10.1 has now been released.
Thank you, Iain, for your hard and fantastic work!
16 matches
Mail list logo
