On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 21:48:32 UTC, Johan wrote:
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 20:30:09 UTC, Cogitri wrote:
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 20:03:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Alpine-Linux-3.12-Released
I'm one of the DLang maintainers
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 21:48:32 UTC, Johan wrote:
Great work.
Which compilers (and versions) are available?
-Johan
Looks like dmd [1], ldc [2], and gdc [3] are all there.
[1] https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/package/edge/community/x86_64/dmd
[2]
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 20:30:09 UTC, Cogitri wrote:
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 20:03:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Alpine-Linux-3.12-Released
I'm one of the DLang maintainers for Alpine - please feel free
to open issues at
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 20:29:37 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 20:14:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/30/20 4:02 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
module foo; @safe:
Again, not the same. Read the full thread that you quoted
above.
And even aside from
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 20:03:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Alpine-Linux-3.12-Released
I'm one of the DLang maintainers for Alpine - please feel free to
open issues at
https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/issues if you notice
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 20:14:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/30/20 4:02 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
module foo; @safe:
Again, not the same. Read the full thread that you quoted above.
And even aside from inference, it doesn't actually work for most
the attributes.
@safe
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 05:08:44 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
Thanks Walter.
Thanks to everyone in the commmunity for being nice and saying
"Thank you." As a cautionary tale, Guido Van Rossum, former BDFL
of Python, resigned over flamewars on the := operator in Python,
the same arguments
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 20:03:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Alpine-Linux-3.12-Released
I recently installed Ubuntu 20.04 LTS on Windows 10.
$sudo apt info gdc
Package: gdc
Version: 4:10.0-1ubuntu2
Priority: optional
Section:
On 5/30/20 4:02 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/30/20 7:39 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 21:18:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/29/2020 2:07 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
It would be great if `@safe:` did not affect declarations that would
otherwise infer annotations.
The
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Alpine-Linux-3.12-Released
On 5/30/20 7:39 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 21:18:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/29/2020 2:07 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
It would be great if `@safe:` did not affect declarations that would
otherwise infer annotations.
The idea is the simple, general rule that:
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 at 16:17:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
+1 this would be perfect.
Not sure if this would work either, but both of these are
already reserved words:
default @safe:
-Steve
It would probably have to be something more like
`default(@safe)`, since `default
On 5/30/20 7:39 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 21:18:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/29/2020 2:07 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
It would be great if `@safe:` did not affect declarations that would
otherwise infer annotations.
The idea is the simple, general rule that:
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 21:38:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 21:18:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The idea is the simple, general rule that:
There's already exceptions to that.
public public void foo() {}
is an error, whereas
public:
public void foo() {}
is not.
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 21:18:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/29/2020 2:07 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
It would be great if `@safe:` did not affect declarations that
would otherwise infer annotations.
The idea is the simple, general rule that:
attribute declaration;
attribute {
On 5/29/2020 2:38 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 21:18:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The idea is the simple, general rule that:
There's already exceptions to that.
public public void foo() {}
is an error, whereas
public:
public void foo() {}
is not.
Is it really an
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 04:53:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The subject says it all.
If you care about memory safety, I recommending adding `safe:`
as the first line in all your project modules, and annotate
individual functions otherwise as necessary. For modules with C
declarations, do as
On 5/29/2020 2:53 AM, solidstate1991 wrote:
Can we get a compiler flag that will enable safe by default for people who might
want it?
It would balkanize the language.
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 11:04:00 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 29 May 2020 at 04:53:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
[...]
Thank you Walter. I am sure this was not an easy decision, and
I respect how you have handled the response.
I think one important takeaway from this should be that
19 matches
Mail list logo
