Thanks for all your hard work, Ali.
+1
I eagerly await it becoming a great portal for people wanting to
learn more about D. And, hopefully, going on to write high
quality libraries I can use. :-)
Well, it is in the sense that it _is_ a deficiency of built-in
AAs for those
who want to be able to use different implementations for
different use cases,
but it's not something that can actually be fixed, and having
to use a library
solution isn't exactly all that bad anyway, especially when
m
In the talk Andrei seems to mentions that D's associative arrays
are lacking in performance somehow. I'm very new to D, but it's
not obvious to me what the shortcoming is. I assume it's that for
some reason it's hard to specialize associative arrays to specfic
types to give increased performanc
On Saturday, 29 June 2013 at 08:37:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I agree with your post, I just want to make a couple of minor
corrections.
On 6/27/2013 4:58 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Do you really think C++ took off because there are commercial
implementations?
I got into the C++ fray in
