On Wednesday, 4 March 2015 at 22:08:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/3/2015 1:15 PM, notna wrote:
not sure if someone should inform them about the DMD name
clash... or just enjoy
the popularity ;)
http://www.gnu.org/software/dmd
I sent them a note.
I'd suggest Daemon Hurder or dhurd.
On Friday, 17 October 2014 at 22:55:24 UTC, Orfeo wrote:
* [endovena] https://github.com/o3o/endovena Boost License 1.0
I would suggest naming the class something other than
Container. Injector or Factory or something.
Container gets confusing with std.container.
On Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 08:22:37 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
The issue isn't class vs struct, but rather value semantic vs
reference semantic (classes are always ref, but structs can
be either).
That's only completely true if structs are referred to by
pointer. ref parameters/returns
On Thursday, 20 March 2014 at 21:16:27 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
I think there's a good case for a std.random2.crypto module
that contains RNGs that are specifically suitable for
cryptography. That said I think the bar here has to be set
VERY high, which is why I didn't even begin
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 23:49:41 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Hello all,
As some of you may already know, monarch_dodra and I have spent
quite a lot of time over the last year discussing the state of
std.random. To cut a long story short, there are significant
problems that
