A new version of LDC, the LLVM based compiler for the D programming language
has been released. It is built with DMDFE version 1.057 and LLVM 2.6. The
runtime library has been upgraded to Tango 0.99.9.
In addition to up-to-date dependencies, this release incorporates a wealth
of fixes and impro
Robert Clipsham wrote:
>> There are quite a few incorrect dstress tests. I've been making tickets
>> for them as I find them.
>
> I believe Christian is the maintainer for the dstress project on
> dsource, he should be able to give you commit access if you have patches.
That's true. I've updated
> "Walter Bright" wrote in message
>> Yes. Constraints determine the list of candidate template declarations,
>> but do not participate in the partial ordering of candidates to determine
>> the 'best' match.
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance, but...umm...what?
Example:
class C {}
vo
> Christian Kamm wrote:
>> Is there a difference between
>> template Foo(T : U) {} and
>> template Foo(T) if(is(T : U)) {} ?
>>
Walter Bright wrote:
> Yes. Constraints determine the list of candidate template declarations,
> but do not participate in the
BLS Wrote:
> I have somehow the idea that D constraints and template specialization
> should merge.
I also feel that specialization may just be a special case of constraints -
with the added benefit that implicit function template instantiation works.
Is there a difference between
template Foo(T
Walter Bright Wrote:
> There are unconfirmed reports that this morning, the C++0x standards
> group in Frankfurt voted to kill Concepts.
This seems to be the relevant pre-Frankfurt text:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2893.pdf
I doubt concepts are 'dead' - from the rumo
Walter Bright Wrote:
> The deps thing comes from the LDC group. They've been relying on it
> as-is, so they'd need to agree on any changes.
Actually, it's from Tomasz' xfBuild
http://wiki.team0xf.com/index.php?n=Tools.XfBuild .
As it is intended as a generally useful dependency format though, I
Timo Gransch wrote:
> Christian Kamm schrieb:
>> but I am using a debug runtime. Does inserting a breakpoint in
>> your code and running to that work?
>
> Back on x86-64 again:
>
> (gdb) break main
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x409150
Since there's main and _Dmain a
Timo Gransch wrote:
> I compile a programm using
>
> ldmd -g -debug test.d
>
> Then I try to debug using gdb with the D patches:
>
> (gdb) list
> 1 ../sysdeps/x86_64/elf/start.S: No such file or directory.
> in ../sysdeps/x86_64/elf/start.S
On x86-32 that gives me a listing of the main fun
use the ldmd wrapper if you want a drop-in
replacement for DMD.
Linux x86-32 download:
http://www.incasoftware.de/~kamm/ldc/ldc-0.9.1-x86_32.tar.bz2
Linux x86-64 download:
http://www.incasoftware.de/~kamm/ldc/ldc-0.9.1-x86_64.tar.bz2
Tomas Lindquist Olsen
Christian Kamm
Frits van Bommel
Kelly
cemiller wrote:
> Can you please take "Christopher E. Miller" out of the Blogs? I don't know
> why it's there pointing back to http://planet.dsource.org - you'd think it
> was an infinite loop!
The feeds for Christopher's, pragma's and h3r3tic's blogs seem to be down.
I'd rather not remove them
The Planet D aggregator at http://planet.dsource.org is being updated again!
Thanks go to Anders Bergh, who made it and provided me with the necessary
files.
Lars Kyllingstad Wrote:
> Are there plans to release a Tango-LDC bundle any time soon?
Yes. There will be a new release of LDC that comes bundled with Tango 0.99.8.
Tomas Lindquist Olsen Wrote:
> Compiling on linux from source is broken! Looks like you forgot to
> include the total.h file!
It compiles with some changes (dchar path, mars.h path, remove copyright.c from
makefile) and the total.h from dmd 1.039.
Thanks for making this available!
> But here I am -
> back with bunch of goodies:
>
> http://petermodzelewski.blogspot.com/2009/02/tango-conference-2008-
rolling-dice.html
> http://petermodzelewski.blogspot.com/2009/02/tango-conference-2008-
ldc.html
Thanks a lot!
Christian
Walter Bright wrote:
> This is great news, congratulations to the LDC team!
>
> Can I ask if a powerpc and ARM version will be available soon?
Thanks!
PowerPC support is still in its infancy. We've had two people looking at it
a few months back, but I haven't heard from either recently. I think
dsimcha wrote:
> Also, some Win32 builds, both w/ and w/o D2 support, would be appreciated
> if
> possible. I am interested in playing around with LDC on Win32 and filing
> bug
> reports, etc. even if exception handling is broken. I just tried to build
> LDC myself and got some ridiculous, inscru
iling list:
ldc-...@googlegroups.com. Alternatively, we're often seen in #ldc on
FreeNode.
Tomas Lindquist Olsen, Christian Kamm
18 matches
Mail list logo
