Exactly zero of the Qt5/6 binding libraries work either with dub
(if they have it on there). I have tried them all and each gets
errors, VisualD or not.
Therefore, it is smart / safe if a Qt5/6 developer stick with Qt
VS tools (if you can get it to function) or simply Qt Creator
itself.
I'm starting a side project here:
https://github.com/enjoysmath/Dots
Post in issues forum if interested enough to join the study group
/ project or email me:
fruitfulapproach
On gmail.
I personally think the kernel, whenever it gets coded out enough,
is going to be blazingly fast. After
On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3:
1) by ponce:
Variant 1:
https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png
Variant 2:
On Thursday, 20 August 2015 at 14:59:33 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 20 August 2015 at 14:45:24 UTC, Daniel wrote:
One thing that always comes to mind is that D does not have a
free, extensive, structured good reference as Go
(https://www.golang-book.com/books/intro) and Rust
On Tuesday, 18 August 2015 at 19:35:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I hate the movie Field of Dreams where they push the idiotic
idea of Build it and they will come. No, they won't. There's
a blizzard of stuff competing for their attention out there,
why should they invest the time looking at
On Tuesday, 18 August 2015 at 19:35:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I hate the movie Field of Dreams where they push the idiotic
idea of Build it and they will come. No, they won't. There's
a blizzard of stuff competing for their attention out there,
why should they invest the time looking at
