BLS schrieb:
> D2 becomes reality , so drop D1 support.
?? I think D1 and tango should not be dropped.
In march 2009 i did a D2 port of DWT. It is called DWT2 and available
from http://hg.dsource.org/projects/dwt2
But i don't know if it still compiles with a current compiler.
Saaa schrieb:
>> Meanwhile the org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86 tree builds for D2. But
>> will not be usable until the missing impls are done.
>
> What does it mean for an implMissing to not be encapsulated within a version
> check?
> Didn't the tango version need those implementations?
>
>
Y
Saaa schrieb:
> dmd 2.026
> phobos
> newest ruby one-click :)
>
> What am I doing wrong ?
>
> C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2>rake
> (in C:/_D/Compiler/dwt2)
> Cleaning
> Building dwt-base
> Building org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86
> C:\_D\Compiler\dwt2\org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86\src\org\eclipse\swt\in
sleek schrieb:
> Will the old dwt-win/linux/samples/addons be modified to work with the new
> Tango release?
>
yes
yidabu schrieb:
> snitppet147
> with dmd 1.037 dwt-win, exe size is 2.47 MB
> with dmd 1.041 dwt2, exe size is 2.75 MB
>
>
oh, i thought the old one was bigger.
yidabu schrieb:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:38:54 +0100
> Frank Benoit wrote:
>
>> yidabu schrieb:
>>> how to building lib file on Windows?
>>> Run Rake, obj fiels generated, Should I to run "lib a.obj b.obj " to
>>> generated dwt2.lib?
>
yidabu schrieb:
> how to building lib file on Windows?
> Run Rake, obj fiels generated, Should I to run "lib a.obj b.obj " to
> generated dwt2.lib?
>
Building libs and apps is not yet integrated. At the moment i just use
it to compile.
yidabu schrieb:
> Rake building error:
>
> dwt2>Rake base --trace
> (in .../dwt2)
> ** Invoke base (first_time)
> ** Execute base
> Building base/src
> dmd @...dwt2\rsp
> dwt2\base\src\java\lang\wrappers.d(15): Error: identifier 'equals_t
> ' is not defined
> dwt2\base\src\java\lang\wr
Christopher Wright schrieb:
> It's well motivated from a development standpoint. I don't see what it
> contributes, otherwise.
there are existing naming conflicts of packages.
org.eclipse.swt => dwt
that was the start. Well then, rename all other swt to dwt also. So we have
SWT => DWT
SWTError =>
Saaa schrieb:
> I'll be trying it out for dmd 2.. how far along is it at the moment?
At the moment the refactoring is complete for D1+Tango.
The 'base' tree compiles also for D2+Tango and i am working on the swt
tree. But compile means really just compile. There is implementation
work needed for
Now there is the new hg repository for DWT2.
DWT2 is like dwt-win/linux/addons, but the folders are organized in the
original directory structure of the Eclipse sources. This also means the
packages are again like the original.
DWT.CENTER =>
SWT.CENTER
import dwt.widgets.
TomD schrieb:
> Bill Baxter Wrote:
> [...]
>> I was hoping you might get some comments on this.
>
> Bad timing, together with Walter adding the backend sources :-)
>
>> It seems to me a lot of people like the idea of XML files to configure
>> a gui. I'm not a big fan of XML, so hard for me to ge
Jacob Carlborg schrieb:
> I've ported all the SWT code, including the Browser package from dwt
> linux. The code is based on SWT just before milestone 3, to be exact
> 3.514.0.
Wow! Thats fantastic news.
Thanks for your work.
14 matches
Mail list logo
