On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:39:27 UTC, eles wrote:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:34:37 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:22, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:13:20 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:01, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:57:15 UTC, dennis
luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis
luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis
luehring
no problem :)
so tell the story what would happen if D scripts will be
without .d?
is your Boss then more interested or can you introduce
D-scripts then silently - what would happen?
He won't really care as long as I don't ask him to modify his
scripts to update the names of those used by me. The latter are
already hard-coded in his and others.
Yes, this has a solution: use of hardlinks (of
identical-content, different name files). I already explained
and acknowledged that in the very first post.
But is cumbersome and unpleasant and bad for backup-ing.
Why not simply rename .d to . then compile, rename back using a
script? It might add a few extra seconds for very large projects
but otherwise insignificant and should work most of the time.
Basically you'll use the script or wrapper app instead of
whatever compile you are using.
