On Thursday, 23 February 2012 at 19:48:11 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Le 23/02/2012 18:27, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/q2pmd/inheriting_purity_in_the_d_programming_language/
Andrei
I'm still not convinced by const (this can lead to very
confusing
Which platforms are supported? Linux? OSX? FreeBSD? I hope it isn't
Windows-only!
Aldo Nunez Wrote:
I'll be posting the D debugger I've been working on at dsource this week.
It'll
be a set of debugging libraries that you can build your own debugger with,
along
with a Debug Engine plug-in
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The only thing I could get to work is this:
struct S
{
int x;
}
inout(int *) getSX(inout S* s) { return s.x;}
void main()
{
S s;
const(S)* sp = s;
int *x = getSX(s);
//int *y = getSX(sp); // uncomment this line for an error
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
struct S
{
int x;
inout(int)* getX() inout { return x;}
}
void main()
{
S s;
int *x = s.getX();
}
testinout.d(10): Error: function testinout.S.getX () inout is not callable
using argument types ()
That's the same error message
Walter Bright Wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Which gdb should this release work with?
I seem to have misplaced my patched gdb. The standard gdb 6.8 can show
backtraces but can't list code, even if the code is linked in libraries
from
C++.
If you're using the standard gdb, try
Walter Bright Wrote:
Robert Clipsham wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Thanks for finally taking this way, Walter =)
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/timeline
Now that DMD is under version control it should be fairly easy for me to
adapt the automated build system used for ldc
Which gdb should this release work with?
I seem to have misplaced my patched gdb. The standard gdb 6.8 can show
backtraces but can't list code, even if the code is linked in libraries from
C++.
Walter Bright wrote:
Another OSX 10.5 release :-)
Anyhow, this should work with gdb now, and
Robert Clipsham Wrote:
You can tell it's a good release when you have to do more than a simple
merge to get it working with ldc ;)
I've pretty much finished merging dmd 2.032 into ldc, ...
Does this mean an official D2 LDC will be coming out shortly?
div0 Wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz wrote:
div0 escribió:
A port of boost::spirit (classic) to D.
For d1/d2:
http://www.sstk.co.uk/spiritd.php.
Thanks, that looks really sweet.
PD: The menu on your website seems impossible
Walter Bright Wrote:
ã®ããã (noshiika) wrote:
Thank you for the great work, Walter and all the other contributors.
But I am a bit disappointed with the CaseRangeStatement syntax.
Why is it
case 0: .. case 9:
instead of
case 0 .. 9:
With the latter notation, ranges
randomSample is in the changelig, but not documented
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_random.html
Walter Bright Wrote:
Something for everyone here.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.046.zip
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Saaa wrote:
Hope you like the cover - my sister's art.
http://tinyurl.com/lyrsyk
Andrei
The first programming book I'll buy :)
500 pages.. is that normal for programming books?
That's just an estimate.
When will estimate become an exact value?
Any
Ary Borenszweig Wrote:
grauzone escribió:
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYCFVPfx4M
How about posting a link to something everyone can play? Like an actual
video file?
Thank you.
Awww, but that made the tauting much better. :-(
Is it possible to close the bugzilla bugs that were fixed?
More generally, bug owners get e-mails when bugs are closed, but don't receive
e-mails when new releases are made. Here I was sitting around waiting for one
of my bugs to get fixed, and here it's been fixed a week and a half :(
Walter
Extrawurst Wrote:
But why is it that since 2.020 i cannot name a package shared anymore?
moudle shared.foo;
dmd: Identifier expected following module
WTF ?
Because shared is now a keyword.
Ok, what is it for ? Where is it documented ? Or is it another reserved
keyword
15 matches
Mail list logo
