Re: DIP 1028--Make @safe the Default--Formal Assessment
Rivet via Digitalmars-d-announce Fri, 22 May 2020 10:55:32 -0700
Perhaps not the ideal solution, but would a compiler flag, e.g.
--strict-safe, that ensures the compiler errors on un-@trusted
non-D function prototypes be appropriate? This way, those who do
work on mission-critical stuff can feel a tad better.
- R... Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP102... Arine via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP1028 - Rati... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP1028 - ... Arine via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP1028 - ... Petar via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP102... NaN via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP 1028--Make @safe th... Paul Backus via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: DIP 1028--Make @safe th... Rivet via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Safety audit and the overlo... Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Safety audit and t... Bruce Carneal via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Safety audit a... Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Rationale ... Bruce Carneal via Digitalmars-d-announce