On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:08:05 +
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Please, this is not important enough to argue here.
ah, excuse me. it's so easy to drag me into such talks... mea culpa.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:48:32 +
anonymous via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> It's pretty much the Nazi anthem.
oh, really? let's see. current German anthem:
Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit
für das deutsche Vaterland!
Danach lasst uns alle streben
brüderlich mit Herz und Hand!
and so on. pr
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:37:30 +
Ola Fosheim Gr via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Now the comma-operator has to stay because removing it is a
> severe breaking change.
but we can abuse opIndex and/or opSlice too! ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 04:31:31 -0400
Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Yea, this *statement* really made me go o_O
>
> link[$.rel = "foobar", $.type = "text/css"];
>
> That's a lot of syntax abuse there!
but it's fun! we all used to think that "$ should mean 'length'" and he
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:57:27 +0200
Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Specially the younger generations, they just use it because it sounds
> cool.
and fun. they don't fear that old dead dog anymore, they making fun of
it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 22:02:31 +
anonymous via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> From a German author that would be an embracement of fascism.
i always wonder how good people at finding various offences and fascims
everywhere.
i bet that such people are glad to censor Hašek's "The Good Soldier
Š
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:19:59 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> No need to demean the question. It is valid. -- Andrei
sorry, i don't mean to insult anyone, just trying to make people see
analogies. hierarchies are everywhere, it's convient way to store alot
of things.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 22:00:57 +
eles via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I don't like Go (syntax, mainly). The sole contender in the
> C++-like family, for systems programming, would be Vala, but
> since they dropped the posix profile... :(
language without CTFE is soo unpleasant to use afte
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:18:09 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> What is it that we could help with? -- Andrei
he's drama queen, he doesn't need any help, only attention.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:33:52 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Do we need a hierarchy of internals, is the problem this big? Why
> mybiglib.wisdom is not good?
ah, why we need such things as subdirectories at all? CP/M was fine
without concept of subdirectories!
signature.asc
D
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:26:36 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Huh? If std.datetime and std.regex are subpackages of `std`
> package, it usually means, they should reside in `std` directory,
> no? And how explicit package protection can change that?
imagine mybiglib, mybiglib.in
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:15:53 +
disapointed user via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> support for windows that really sucks.
that is 'cause windows really sucks.
> good luck in the future for all you guys
you too.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:19:37 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Can't it be addressed by publishing release schedule, like llvm
> does it, to indicate the work is going on?
hm. sounds reasonable. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 07:25:43 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
but it requires to dump all 'subpackages' into one flat directory and
with ugly names.
proposed extension will not break any existing code, yet will allow much
nicer hierarchy.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:41:29 +0900
Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
btw. http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing contains bug #10928 as
"blocker", but it's marked as "RESOLVED FIXED" in bugzilla. and bug
#12696 needs to be rechecked, as it seems to be fixed too.
signature.asc
Descrip
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:27:34 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I think it would be great to motivate the change properly. -- Andrei
aren't it motivated enough in PR? this will allow to build real package
hierarchies instead of dumping everything in one flat package.
my
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:24:54 +
Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
> publication it's on LOR?
sorry, i mean DIY. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:24:54 +
Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
> publication it's on LOR?
DYI.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:22:08 -0400
Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Well, people will invent *any* excuse to pass over anything they
> don't feel like bothering with. It sounds like that's probably what
> they were doing.
not exactly, 'cause they *are* interested in using D, es
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:48:00 +
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I don't see how infrequent, stable releases are more likely to
> provoke that reaction than frequent, unstable releases.
"stability" is something that cannot be achieved in living language.
and having offic
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:01:24 +
bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> What's the advantage of this over maintaing packages for the RC
> version until it's ready?
'cause not releasing periodically means "ah, it will never be ready!
let's look at another language, D is not worth using ye
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 13:01:06 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> OK, -m32mscoff works (probably I was using a wrongly written
> switch), but I don't see it listed among the other compiler
> switches.
maybe this is due to mscoff support still considering 'experimental'?
signat
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 11:34:59 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Yes, I am using a 32 bit Windows.
are you sure that you have latest git then? yes, i know that this is
very silly question, but sometimes... ;-)
unfortunately, i have no windows boxes (neither cross-compilers), so
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 10:50:38 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I have just recompiled dmd, but I don't see that new compiler
> switch (dmd 2.067).
are you sure that you compiled dmd for 32-bit windows? other versions
seems to not have this flag.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
subj. C API wrapped in a nice struct (WARNING! ugly mixins
inside!). there is no extensive documentation (oh, c'mon, do you
really need it?), but repo contains sample tag viewer/editor.
requires taglib_c (C wrapper from the original taglib package).
repo: http://repo.or.cz/w/taglib.d.git
a small update for parser: it is now possible to parse so-called
"scripts" (only from 'string' type for now). sample script can
look like this one, which centers two buttons inside the panel,
keepeng equal button sizes:
===[cutline]===
var(stay)
panel.left = 0,
panel.top = 0,
panel.width
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 23:12:43 +0200
Mike Wey via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> GtkD is a D binding and OO wrapper of Gtk+ and is released on the LGPL
> license.
>
> The most notable changes in this release are the discontinuation of
> the support for D1, and better support for installing more t
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:49:09 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> it must have a commit I have squashed.
> I do this quite often since sometimes I commit stuff that causes
> my build to fail :p
btw, please, don't do that. just revert commits, there's no need to
rewrite the histo
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 03:27:58 +
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I got that error recently. It is an LLVM bug and upgrading LLVM
> should do the trick.
in my case it was nothing with LLVM. sdc-32 needs dmd-2.065, and i'm
using dmd-2.066-master. switching to 2.065 resolves the iss
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 23:16:43 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Thanks for your cooperation!
you're welcome. %-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 2 Aug 2014 01:37:33 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
damn, it's hard to switch between two dmds. ok, i compiled everything,
here's the timings:
./runner 2> /dev/null > /dev/null 21.39s user 1.48s system 146% cpu 15.643
total
./jsonRunner 2> /dev/null
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 22:16:50 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> sh buildTester.sh
alas, i have no LLVMArchive, and it refuses to link without it. when i
removed -L-lLLVMArchive, it says that
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-slackware-linux/4.9.1/../../../libLLVMSupport.a(Process.o):
In funct
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 21:58:58 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> enableing multihtreading and such
i explititely passes runner.d -j1 (other cores has work to do too %-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:29:59 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
still, very impressive!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:33:39 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> please try to compile a few tests and tell me if it works
results of runner.d: http://dpaste.com/0P4DXGE
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:54:42 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> AFAICS this it because you are using dmd-master
> if it fails with the dmd-2.065 then I have a real nut to crack
sorry, you are right. downgrading to dmd-2.065 fixes the build.
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:40:31 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Are you on a 64bit system ?
no, i said somewhere in the previous messages that i'm using x86 arch.
%-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:33:05 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> please do `git pull` and if the error presists post the full
> error-message on dpaste or similar.
you're welcome.
upgated to git commit 58a36a1acdc6b9a5bcd07edf69b958c3b4ac1657
build log: http://dpaste.com/2NBTC
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:07:56 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> hmm it looks like you are not linking llvm in ...
but i am. %-) or, better to say, your makefile doing it with
`llvm-config --libs`.
> do you use the most recent version from my sdc32-experimental
> repo ?
yes, j
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:39:15 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
can't link it. GNU/Linux, x86, latest DMD from git.
lib/libd.a(semantic.o): In function
`_D1d3ast10expression56__T15UnaryExpressionTC1d3ast10expression13AstExpressionZ15UnaryExpression11__T6__ctorZ6__ctorMFS1d8locat
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:43:56 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
ah. sure i'll try to write you about every bug i found. %-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:36:37 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
wow.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 15:16:07 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
heh. but i have a nice text parser! so it's not a completely trashcan
work. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:01:45 +
Yuriy via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> +1
> http://code.dlang.org/packages/cassowary-d
damn it! my google-fu sux again. i did search and found nothing, so
made a port. feel so stupid now...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
preliminary, but working port of Cassowary Solver — GUI-oriented
constraint solver, toolkit-agnostic layout engine. it's not
D-spirited yet, but it works. todo list includes templated
classes and bindings for gtk.d. feel free to fork and improve.
url: http://repo.or.cz/w/cassowary.d.git
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 01:11:00 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I have completed the translation of the book.
great news! and great book. thank you.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:53:07 +0200
Lionello Lunesu via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> It's fine, I can create the PR for you
there is one already, but without tests:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2336
> You'll get the credit as well, of course.
i don't care about credits
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:19:43 +
Dragos Carp via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Fix is in Bugzilla attached, though without an unittest
> demonstrating the error.
test is in bugzilla, but it's not formatted as unittest, just as
standalone module copypasted in comments. my fault, i'm really so
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:03:38 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> You mean http://issues.dlang.org? That's used regularly.
oh, really? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12853
> Whatcha waiting for? reports + pull requests please. Thanks! -- Andrei
have no motivati
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:39:56 +
uri via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> You spent the effort implementing a fix, the time talking about
> your fix but cannot be buggered submitting a PR for the fix?
one fix at a time, not more. the first one is still sitting in
bugtracker, collecting dust. ma
bug tracker is just a thing to collecting dust. you can write your
report there, or to /dev/null, or not write it at all -- the result
will be the same.
i know at least 3 bugs in phobos and at least one very nasty bug in
compiler (which causes UB, so-called heisenbug), but have no motivation
to re
this is quick-and-dirty port of TweetNaCl to D. it's not a proper
'D rewrite' of TweetNaCl, it still shows it's C roots, but it
works. and it has test suite and ddoc which original TweetNaCl
lacks.
WARNING! API is subject to change. but you can take the current
version and use it as-is if the
If something's open source with no commercial intent, is there
good
reason not to use gpl? How hard is it to change later?
i don't see a reason not to use GPL even on commercial code. %-)
btw, what is the license for your code?
I don't really care. Refer to it as much as you like.
so maybe you will add license to sources? WTFPL, for example,
which basically means "public domain". the thing is that sources
without license are proprietary, and nobody except the author can
do anyt
On Sunday, 20 April 2014 at 15:17:56 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
https://github.com/TurkeyMan/superemu
wow, my google-fu is bad than. %-) doing 'git clone' right now.
btw, what is the license for your code?
Funny you make a point of forceinline, I have forceinline
placeholders
On Sunday, 20 April 2014 at 13:08:02 UTC, bearophile wrote:
sorry, it uses GDC @attribute("forceinline") feature, so you
Have you performed a benchmark with and without that attribute?
not on this code yet. will check it someday,
http://repo.or.cz/w/zymosis.d.git
In this kind of code compute
quick-and-dirty port of my Zymosis Z80 emulation engine to D.
code was built from scratch and not using huge tables to generate
huge sources (it's just one module with source size ~64KB).
it properly emulates all known Z80 quirks (including MEMPTR
register) and passes all 1335 tests from FUSE.
301 - 357 of 357 matches
Mail list logo
