Re: [GSoC] Mir.random.flex - Generic non-uniform random sampling

2016-08-23 Thread tn via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 at 12:12:30 UTC, Seb wrote: On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 at 11:58:53 UTC, tn wrote: On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 15:34:47 UTC, Seb wrote: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/random/2016/08/22/transformed-density-rejection-sampling.html What are the columns "mu time" and "sigma^2

Re: [GSoC] Mir.random.flex - Generic non-uniform random sampling

2016-08-23 Thread tn via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 15:34:47 UTC, Seb wrote: http://blog.mir.dlang.io/random/2016/08/22/transformed-density-rejection-sampling.html What are the columns "mu time" and "sigma^2 time" of the benchmark table in the Sampling subsection?

Re: DUB 0.9.22 released

2014-09-26 Thread tn via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 26 September 2014 at 06:29:21 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote: Though you could use prerelease and/or build suffixes (1.2.3-0w / 1.2.3+0w). These are very close to what I would like to see. Though, if I understand correctly, build suffix wouldn't work, as for example 1.2.3+0w and 1.2.3+1w w

Re: DUB 0.9.22 released

2014-09-23 Thread tn via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 06:22:27 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 22/09/14 23:04, tn wrote: What is the recommended way of versioning bindings? If the binding of the target library 1.2.3 is versioned as 1.2.3 and a bug is fixed in the binding (no change in the target library), how should

Re: DUB 0.9.22 released

2014-09-22 Thread tn via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 22 September 2014 at 09:33:52 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: If you can think of any potentially important and especially backwards-incompatible changes/additions, please mention them (ideally as GitHub tickets), so that we can include them before the 1.0.0 release. What is the recommend