On Monday, 6 January 2020 at 14:37:54 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
gah, there goes that idea. So I guess that means the lambda
callbacks for ui classes must be implemented in Java too. alas.
but still most things work anyway so still fun.
hum ... indeed most of the native samples in android
On Saturday, 4 January 2020 at 16:59:13 UTC, visitor wrote:
On Thursday, 2 January 2020 at 20:36:46 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
Getting there. I think I have a plan for making new Java
classes from D too that I'll play with when I get more time...
Your createJVM() setup works fine on my
On Thursday, 2 January 2020 at 20:36:46 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Getting there. I think I have a plan for making new Java
classes from D too that I'll play with when I get more time...
!!! You tried very hard to blow up the whole thing !
Sorry, nope ! still running fine :)
i didn't try
On Wednesday, 1 January 2020 at 18:15:32 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
i see you updated everything ! wow !! :))
just a note : i had to add a sourceSets instruction
```
android {
...
defaultConfig {
...
}
sourceSets {
main {
// let gradle pack the shared
On Wednesday, 1 January 2020 at 16:48:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 January 2020 at 12:44:30 UTC, visitor wrote:
i managed to run the test app on my phone via Android Studio
:))
Nice! I just realized that I forgot to commit some of the files
so cool that you got it working
On Monday, 16 December 2019 at 21:37:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I'm gonna drop the link here without further comment:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/d_android
hopefully I've written enough in the repo so anyone who wants
to play with it can... and if not, I need to fix the docs :)
let me
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 at 19:48:19 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
After working some with Angular and ngrx/store I really came to
like the redux pattern.
Unfortunately, I couldn't find a package on code.dlang.org that
filled that spot when coming back to D.
So I build my own.
It is
On Sunday, 19 February 2017 at 11:24:17 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Revision 4 of the ldc2 snap package is now available in the
'edge' channel of the snap store.
Works for me on ubuntu 16.04 (llvm-3.8), Thanks :-)
Not heavily tested, just to let you know for some feedback on
your
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 05:45:55 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
Well, I believe it's a matter of taste. By allowing different
number of elements there you allow more errors to sink in
without gaining anything at all. You lose the choice between
strict and loose operators, erase the difference.
On Monday, 23 November 2015 at 16:58:43 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Nice. Why first enforce is "==" rather than ">=" ? This
prevents something like:
auto arr = ["hello", "world", "!"];
string hello;
string world;
let (hello, world) = arr;
note that this is thedeemon's work ! (sorry couldn't
On Monday, 23 November 2015 at 18:38:45 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
let (hello, world)[] = arr;
i think what Andrea Fontana is talking is the other way around
your solution allows
let (hello, world)[] = ["hi"];
Andrea Fontana(s allows
let (hello, world) = ["hi", "there", "!"];
On Monday, 23 November 2015 at 10:28:53 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
On Sunday, 22 November 2015 at 18:47:34 UTC, visitor wrote:
What is the reason for using pointers (alias pointerOf(T) = T*
etc...)
it works without ! what am i missing ?
What and how exactly works without?
My original solution
On Monday, 23 November 2015 at 20:10:49 UTC, visitor wrote:
Andrea Fontana(s allows
let (hello, world) = ["hi", "there", "!"];
of course in your version let (hello, world)[] = ["hi", "there",
"!"] works
but for consistency with range, i think Fontana's note is relevant
hello,
Learning here, hope i don"t excavate unnecessarily an old post
What is the reason for using pointers (alias pointerOf(T) = T*
etc...)
it works without ! what am i missing ?
Thanks
14 matches
Mail list logo
