Re: ATTN Derelict Users and Package Maintainers

2014-12-31 Thread OlaOst via Digitalmars-d-announce
Works fine for me on windows, after running 'dub upgrade'. I tested the SharedLibVersion with a 2.0.1 and a 2.0.3 SDL dll. With the 2.0.3 dll, I could call functions added in SDL 2.0.2 even when using SharedLibVersion(2, 0, 0) - is this intended behaviour? With the 2.0.1 DLL I got the

Re: ATTN Derelict Users and Package Maintainers

2014-12-31 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 31 December 2014 at 10:26:18 UTC, OlaOst wrote: Works fine for me on windows, after running 'dub upgrade'. I tested the SharedLibVersion with a 2.0.1 and a 2.0.3 SDL dll. With the 2.0.3 dll, I could call functions added in SDL 2.0.2 even when using SharedLibVersion(2, 0, 0) - is

Re: ATTN Derelict Users and Package Maintainers

2014-12-31 Thread ponce via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 31 December 2014 at 11:20:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Wednesday, 31 December 2014 at 10:26:18 UTC, OlaOst wrote: Works fine for me on windows, after running 'dub upgrade'. I tested the SharedLibVersion with a 2.0.1 and a 2.0.3 SDL dll. With the 2.0.3 dll, I could call functions

ATTN Derelict Users and Package Maintainers

2014-12-30 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
I've added a new feature to Derelict that I'd appreciate some feedback on. It works for me, but I want to verify that it works in the wild before I expand it to other packages and move forward with another feature I plan to add. You can read more about it in my blog post at [1]. If you are