If option -shared is selected, will it automatically generate
as PIC, or do you have to also specify -fPIC?
When I used gfortran, it was -shared only on windows, on linux
both options: -shared and -fPIC.
Was obtained empirically.
On 2/8/2013 6:19 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 7 Feb 2013 20:21, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
mailto:newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
No, I can't say who it is at this time. Sorry. But it is a huge opportunity
for us.
To get the design win, we need to:
(a) get dynamic
Am 08.02.2013 08:18, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 2/7/2013 10:36 PM, Oleg Kuporosov wrote:
That is cool, but what is the target platform - Win/Lin, 32/64?
Initially, Linux. Once that is worked out, doing the others should be
straightforward.
Well windows will be quite some work because DLLs
On 2013-02-07 21:16, Walter Bright wrote:
No, I can't say who it is at this time. Sorry. But it is a huge
opportunity for us.
To get the design win, we need to:
(a) get dynamic linking and loading to work
We want to have this on all platforms but is there a platform that is
prioritized for
On 2013-02-07 22:01, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Thursday, 7 February 2013 at 20:16:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
No, I can't say who it is at this time. Sorry. But it is a huge
opportunity for us.
This is nice.
To get the design win, we need to:
(a) get dynamic linking and loading to work
On 2013-02-07 21:16, Walter Bright wrote:
(a) get dynamic linking and loading to work
I'm willing to help on this one, especially for Mac OS X. I have wanted
this for quite a long time.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 7 February 2013 at 20:16:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
No, I can't say who it is at this time. Sorry. But it is a huge
opportunity for us.
To get the design win, we need to:
(a) get dynamic linking and loading to work
AFAIK Martin Nowak has done first part for you.
Pull requests
On Feb 7, 2013, at 12:16 PM, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
No, I can't say who it is at this time. Sorry. But it is a huge opportunity
for us.
To get the design win, we need to:
(a) get dynamic linking and loading to work
Which platform? Loading a single dynamic D
On Thursday, 7 February 2013 at 20:16:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
No, I can't say who it is at this time. Sorry. But it is a huge
opportunity for us.
To get the design win, we need to:
(a) get dynamic linking and loading to work
(b) improve language safety without degrading efficiency
(c)
On 2/8/2013 12:29 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Feb 7, 2013, at 12:16 PM, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
No, I can't say who it is at this time. Sorry. But it is a huge opportunity
for us.
To get the design win, we need to:
(a) get dynamic linking and loading to work
Which
On 7 Feb 2013 20:21, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
No, I can't say who it is at this time. Sorry. But it is a huge
opportunity for us.
To get the design win, we need to:
(a) get dynamic linking and loading to work
We should probably discuss implemetation ideas when you
The compiler currently has an option -shared for generating a
shared library. It also has an option -fPIC for generating
position independent code.
If option -shared is selected, will it automatically generate as
PIC, or do you have to also specify -fPIC?
--rt
On 2/7/2013 12:34 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
What do you mean by design win? You mean we'd win another company over to D?
Yes (for a project of theirs).
On 2/7/13, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/7/2013 12:34 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
What do you mean by design win? You mean we'd win another company over
to D?
Yes (for a project of theirs).
Can you give us a teaser on generally what kind of work they do?
On Thursday, 7 February 2013 at 20:16:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
No, I can't say who it is at this time. Sorry. But it is a huge
opportunity for us.
This is nice.
To get the design win, we need to:
(a) get dynamic linking and loading to work
Wasn't this realized before? By the way, last
On 2/7/2013 1:01 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
I guess recent patches dedicated to the issue came at right time.
The timing is indeed fortuitous.
As for your comments about vagueness, yes, it is vague. The DLL support is
clear, though, it either works or it doesn't. The other issues are a work in
On Thursday, 7 February 2013 at 21:11:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/7/2013 1:01 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
I guess recent patches dedicated to the issue came at right
time.
The timing is indeed fortuitous.
As for your comments about vagueness, yes, it is vague. The DLL
support is clear,
Am 07.02.2013 22:11, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 2/7/2013 1:01 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
I guess recent patches dedicated to the issue came at right time.
The timing is indeed fortuitous.
As for your comments about vagueness, yes, it is vague. The DLL support
is clear, though, it either works
On Thursday, 7 February 2013 at 20:16:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
No, I can't say who it is at this time. Sorry. But it is a huge
opportunity for us.
To get the design win, we need to:
(a) get dynamic linking and loading to work
(b) improve language safety without degrading efficiency
(c)
Am Thu, 07 Feb 2013 22:01:10 +0100
schrieb Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru:
On Thursday, 7 February 2013 at 20:16:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
(a) get dynamic linking and loading to work
Wasn't this realized before? By the way, last weeks there seems
to be increasing dynamic linking
On 2/7/2013 10:36 PM, Oleg Kuporosov wrote:
That is cool, but what is the target platform - Win/Lin, 32/64?
Initially, Linux. Once that is worked out, doing the others should be
straightforward.
21 matches
Mail list logo
